Time-triggering versus event-triggering control over communication channels

Time-triggered and event-triggered control strategies for stabilization of an unstable plant over a rate-limited communication channel subject to unknown, bounded delay are studied and compared. Event triggering carries implicit information, revealing the state of the plant. However, the delay in th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCDC : 2017 IEEE 56th annual Conference on Decision and Control : 12-15 December 2017 pp. 5432 - 5437
Main Authors Khojasteh, Mohammad Javad, Tallapragada, Pavankumar, Cortes, Jorge, Franceschetti, Massimo
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
DOI10.1109/CDC.2017.8264463

Cover

More Information
Summary:Time-triggered and event-triggered control strategies for stabilization of an unstable plant over a rate-limited communication channel subject to unknown, bounded delay are studied and compared. Event triggering carries implicit information, revealing the state of the plant. However, the delay in the communication channel causes information loss, as it makes the state information out of date. There is a critical delay value, when the loss of information due to the communication delay perfectly compensates the implicit information carried by the triggering events. This occurs when the maximum delay equals the inverse of the entropy rate of the plant. In this context, extensions of our previous results for event triggering strategies are presented for vector systems and are compared with the data-rate theorem for time-triggered control, that is extended here to a setting with unknown delay.
DOI:10.1109/CDC.2017.8264463