Analysis of LEACH protocol(s) using formal verification

WSN nodes operate in an unattended environment and thus have irreplaceable batteries. Thus an important concern is the network lifetime; we need to utilize their energy for a longer time otherwise nodes run out of power. For this purpose various protocols have been established and the subject of our...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2015 12th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST) pp. 254 - 262
Main Authors Ihsan, A., Saghar, K., Fatima, T.
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 01.01.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2151-1403
DOI10.1109/IBCAST.2015.7058513

Cover

More Information
Summary:WSN nodes operate in an unattended environment and thus have irreplaceable batteries. Thus an important concern is the network lifetime; we need to utilize their energy for a longer time otherwise nodes run out of power. For this purpose various protocols have been established and the subject of our matter is the LEACH protocol. The LEACH protocol is self-organizing and is characterized as an adaptive clustering protocol which uses randomly distributes energy load among nodes. By using cluster heads and data aggregation excessive energy consumption is avoided. In this paper we analyzed LEACH and its extensions like LEACH-C and LEACH-F using Formal modeling techniques. Formal modeling is often used by researchers these days to verify a variety of routing protocols. By using formal verification one can precisely confirm the authenticity of results and worst case scenarios, a solution not possible using computer simulations and hardware implementation. In this paper, we have applied formal verification to compare how efficient LEACH is as compared to its extensions in various WSN topologies. The paper is not about design improvement of LEACH but to formally verify its correctness, efficiency and performance as already stated. This work is novel as LEACH and its extensions according to our knowledge have not been analyzed using formal verification techniques.
ISSN:2151-1403
DOI:10.1109/IBCAST.2015.7058513