Benchmarking the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm and RSA in Key Signing and Verification Operations with Parallelism

Cryptographic techniques play a crucial role in securing information, and selecting an appropriate cryptographic technique involves considering factors such as encryption strength and computational overhead. Asymmetric cryptographic protocols and algorithms, such as RSA and those based on elliptic c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in2023 Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, & Applied Computing (CSCE) pp. 2521 - 2527
Main Authors Dimitoglou, George, Jim, Carol
Format Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published IEEE 24.07.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
DOI10.1109/CSCE60160.2023.00405

Cover

More Information
Summary:Cryptographic techniques play a crucial role in securing information, and selecting an appropriate cryptographic technique involves considering factors such as encryption strength and computational overhead. Asymmetric cryptographic protocols and algorithms, such as RSA and those based on elliptic curve cryptography, are widely used for their flexibility, encryption strength, and key management. This study focuses on comparing the performance of the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) and RSA, specifically analyzing the impact of parallelism on signing and verification operations. The experimental results demonstrate that ECDSA is faster in signing but slower in verification compared to RSA. However, RSA's performance declines rapidly with increasing key sizes, while ECDSA exhibits a more graceful degradation. The study highlights the advantages of using elliptic curves in terms of reduced key sizes and the potential for ECDSA to become a preferred solution as security requirements increase. The paper's uniqueness is based on the impact of parallel processing on the performance of both cryptosystems. Future work involves further investigating the observed performance patterns and examining the implications of post-quantum resistance.
DOI:10.1109/CSCE60160.2023.00405