A Comparison of Two Cockpit Color Concepts Under Mesopic Lighting Using a CRT Task

This paper compares two different color lighting concepts (white and red) for the instrument cluster in mid-range cars while driving in urban areas under mesopic lighting. The main objective was to assess whether both concepts yielded similar results in terms of attention, interpretability and diffe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman Interface and the Management of Information: Information, Knowledge and Interaction Design Vol. 10273; pp. 170 - 183
Main Authors Götze, Martin, Conti, Antonia S., Bengler, Klaus
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Springer International Publishing
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN3319585207
9783319585208
ISSN0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-58521-5_13

Cover

More Information
Summary:This paper compares two different color lighting concepts (white and red) for the instrument cluster in mid-range cars while driving in urban areas under mesopic lighting. The main objective was to assess whether both concepts yielded similar results in terms of attention, interpretability and differentiability of information. For the experiment, 30 participants performed a Continuous Tracking Task as main task demanding continuous attention in order to model a real driving situation. The aim of the secondary task was to observe a cockpit display and perform a choice reaction time task. Statistical tests were performed to examine the error rates and reaction times for the CRT task. No significant differences were found. This study confirms that a white concept shows no disadvantages relative to a red color concept while driving under mesopic lighting conditions.
ISBN:3319585207
9783319585208
ISSN:0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-58521-5_13