Fair Division with Subsidy

When allocating a set of goods to a set of agents, a classic fairness notion called envy-freeness requires that no agent prefer the allocation of another agent to her own. When the goods are indivisible, this notion is impossible to guarantee, and prior work has focused on its relaxations. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlgorithmic Game Theory Vol. 11801; pp. 374 - 389
Main Authors Halpern, Daniel, Shah, Nisarg
Format Book Chapter
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Springer International Publishing AG 2019
Springer International Publishing
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISBN3030304728
9783030304720
ISSN0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI10.1007/978-3-030-30473-7_25

Cover

More Information
Summary:When allocating a set of goods to a set of agents, a classic fairness notion called envy-freeness requires that no agent prefer the allocation of another agent to her own. When the goods are indivisible, this notion is impossible to guarantee, and prior work has focused on its relaxations. However, envy-freeness can be achieved if a third party is willing to subsidize by providing a small amount of money (divisible good), which can be allocated along with the indivisible goods. In this paper, we study the amount of subsidy needed to achieve envy-freeness for agents with additive valuations, both for a given allocation of indivisible goods and when we can choose the allocation. In the former case, we provide a strongly polynomial time algorithm to minimize subsidy. In the latter case, we provide optimal constructive results for the special cases of binary and identical valuations, and make a conjecture in the general case. Our experiments using real data show that a small amount of subsidy is sufficient in practice.
Bibliography:Full version of this paper is available at www.cs.toronto.edu/~nisarg/papers/subsidy.pdf.
ISBN:3030304728
9783030304720
ISSN:0302-9743
1611-3349
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-30473-7_25