Assessment of Patient-Led or Physician-Driven Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes Using Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimens: A 1-year multicenter study
OBJECTIVE: The benefits of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have been demonstrated in patients with type 1 diabetes. Our aim was to compare the effect of two modes of use of CGM, patient led or physician driven, for 1 year in subjects with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DES...
Saved in:
Published in | Diabetes care Vol. 35; no. 5; pp. 965 - 971 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Web Resource |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Diabetes Association
01.05.2012
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0149-5992 1935-5548 1935-5548 0149-5992 |
DOI | 10.2337/dc11-2021 |
Cover
Summary: | OBJECTIVE: The benefits of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have been demonstrated in patients with type 1 diabetes. Our aim was to compare the effect of two modes of use of CGM, patient led or physician driven, for 1 year in subjects with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with type 1 diabetes aged 8–60 years with HbA1c ≥8% were randomly assigned to three groups (1:1:1). Outcomes for glucose control were assessed at 1 year for two modes of CGM (group 1: patient led; group 2: physician driven) versus conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (group 3: control). RESULTS: A total of 257 subjects with type 1 diabetes underwent screening. Of these, 197 were randomized, with 178 patients completing the study (age: 36 ± 14 years; HbA1c: 8.9 ± 0.9%). HbA1c improved similarly in both CGM groups and was reduced compared with the control group (group 1 vs. group 3: –0.52%, P = 0.0006; group 2 vs. group 3: –0.47%, P = 0.0008; groups 1 + 2 vs. group 3: –0.50%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in the three groups. Patient SF-36 questionnaire physical health score improved in both experimental CGM groups (P = 0.004). Sensor consumption was 34% lower in group 2 than in group 1 (median [Q1–Q3] consumption: group 1: 3.42/month [2.20–3.91] vs. group 2: 2.25/month [1.27–2.99], P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both patient-led and physician-driven CGM provide similar long-term improvement in glucose control in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes, but the physician-driven CGM mode used fewer sensors. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2021 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 PMCID: PMC3329830 scopus-id:2-s2.0-84862113120 |
ISSN: | 0149-5992 1935-5548 1935-5548 0149-5992 |
DOI: | 10.2337/dc11-2021 |