Effects of population size and isolation on the genetic structure of the East African mountain white‐eye Zosterops poliogaster (Aves)

• Published in: Biological journal of the Linnean Society Vol. 114; no. 4; pp. 828 - 836
• Main Authors: Husemann, Martin, Cousseau, Laurence, Borghesio, Luca, Lens, Luc, Habel, Jan Christian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Published for the Linnean Society of London by Blackwell [etc.] 01.04.2015; Blackwell Publishing Ltd; Oxford University Press
• Subjects: alleles; Aves; birds; cloud forest; Cloud forests; Eastern Africa; effective population size; Environmental degradation; fragmentation; Genetic diversity; Genetic drift; Genetic structure; genetic variation; habitat destruction; habitat isolation; habitat size; Habitats; metapopulation dynamics; microsatellite repeats; microsatellites; Mountains; Population number; population size; tropical montane cloud forests; Zosterops; Eastern Africa; East Africa; Africa
• ISSN: 0024-4066; 1095-8312
• DOI: 10.1111/bij.12468

Habitat size, quality and isolation determine the genetic structure and diversity of populations and may influence their evolutionary potential and vulnerability to stochastic events. Small and isolated populations are subject to strong genetic drift and can lose much of their genetic diversity due to stochastic fixation and loss of alleles. The mountain white‐eye Zosterops poliogaster, a cloud forest bird species, is exclusively found in the high mountains of East Africa. We analysed 13 polymorphic microsatellites for 213 individuals of this species that were sampled at different points in time in three mountain massifs differing in habitat size, isolation and habitat degradation. We analysed the genetic differentiation among mountain populations and estimated the effective population sizes. Our results indicate three mountain‐specific genetic clusters. Time cohorts did not show genetic divergences, suggesting that populations are large enough to prevent strong drift effects. Effective population sizes were higher in larger and geographically interconnected habitat patches. Our findings underline the relevance of ecological barriers even for mobile species and show the importance of investigating different estimators of population size, including both approaches based on single and multiple time‐points of sampling, for the inference of the demographic status of a population. © 2015 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 114, 828–836.