A Feature-Driven Decision Support System for Heart Failure Prediction Based on χ2 Statistical Model and Gaussian Naive Bayes

Heart failure (HF) is considered a deadliest disease worldwide. Therefore, different intelligent medical decision support systems have been widely proposed for detection of HF in literature. However, low rate of accuracies achieved on the HF data is a major problem in these decision support systems....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputational and mathematical methods in medicine Vol. 2019; no. 2019; pp. 1 - 8
Main Authors Nour, Redhwan, Qasim, Iqbal, Yakubu, Imrana, Golilarz, Noorbakhsh Amiri, Khan, Shafqat Ullah, Ali, Liaqat, Noor, Adeeb
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2019
Hindawi
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1748-670X
1748-6718
DOI10.1155/2019/6314328

Cover

More Information
Summary:Heart failure (HF) is considered a deadliest disease worldwide. Therefore, different intelligent medical decision support systems have been widely proposed for detection of HF in literature. However, low rate of accuracies achieved on the HF data is a major problem in these decision support systems. To improve the prediction accuracy, we have developed a feature-driven decision support system consisting of two main stages. In the first stage, χ2 statistical model is used to rank the commonly used 13 HF features. Based on the χ2 test score, an optimal subset of features is searched using forward best-first search strategy. In the second stage, Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) classifier is used as a predictive model. The performance of the newly proposed method (χ2-GNB) is evaluated by using an online heart disease database of 297 subjects. Experimental results show that our proposed method could achieve a prediction accuracy of 93.33%. The developed method (i.e., χ2-GNB) improves the HF prediction performance of GNB model by 3.33%. Moreover, the newly proposed method also shows better performance than the available methods in literature that achieved accuracies in the range of 57.85–92.22%.
Bibliography:Academic Editor: Yuhai Zhao
ISSN:1748-670X
1748-6718
DOI:10.1155/2019/6314328