Generic Assessment Rubrics For Computer Programming Courses
In programming, one problem can usually be solved using different logics and constructs but still producing the same output. Sometimes students get marked down inappropriately if their solutions do not follow the answers cheme. In addition, lab exercises and programming assignments are not necessary...
Saved in:
| Published in | TOJET : the Turkish online journal of educational technology Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 53 - 68 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Adapazari
Sakarya Üniversitesi Yayınları
01.01.2016
Sakarya University |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 2146-7242 1303-6521 1303-6521 |
Cover
| Summary: | In programming, one problem can usually be solved using different logics and constructs but still producing the same output. Sometimes students get marked down inappropriately if their solutions do not follow the answers cheme. In addition, lab exercises and programming assignments are not necessary graded by the instructors but most of the time by the teaching assistants or lab demon strators. This results in grading inconsistencies in termsof the marks awarded when the same solution is being graded by different person. To address this issue, a set of assessment rubric is necessary in order to provide flexibility for critical and creative solutions among students aswell as to improve grading consistencies among instructors and teaching assistants or demonstrators. This paperreports the development of assessment rubric for each domain in computer programming courses; cognitive,psychomotor, and affective. The rubrics were then implemented for one academic semester consisting of 14weeks. An interrater reliability analysis based on Kappa statistic was performed to determine the consistency inusing the rubrics among instructors The weighted kappa is 0.810, therefore, the strength of agreement or there liability of the rubric can be considered to be ‘very good’. This indicates that the scoring categories in the rubrics are well-defined and the differences between the score categories are clear. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 2146-7242 1303-6521 1303-6521 |