Does forest thinning reduce fire severity in Australian eucalypt forests?

Forest thinning has been proposed to reduce fire severity. However, evidence to support this strategy in Australia is scant. We completed a detailed empirical analysis of stand history data from forests burned in wildfires in 2009 in south‐eastern Australia, to address the question: Does forest thin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inConservation letters Vol. 14; no. 2
Main Authors Taylor, Chris, Blanchard, Wade, Lindenmayer, David B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2021
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1755-263X
1755-263X
DOI10.1111/conl.12766

Cover

More Information
Summary:Forest thinning has been proposed to reduce fire severity. However, evidence to support this strategy in Australia is scant. We completed a detailed empirical analysis of stand history data from forests burned in wildfires in 2009 in south‐eastern Australia, to address the question: Does forest thinning reduce fire severity? The answer varied depending on fire type (Crown Burn vs. Crown Burn/Crown Scorch), forest type, and stand age. For the statistical relationship for Crown Burn, there were no thinning effects in ash‐type forests. For mixed species forests, thinning reduced the probability of Crown Burn in young stands but increased it in older stands. Data for the fire severity category of Crown Burn/Crown Scorch revealed that thinning generally elevated fire severity, irrespective of stand age, forest type, or fire zone. Except for 20‐ to 40‐year‐old mixed species forest subject to Crown Burn, proposals for thinning to reduce fire severity have limited support.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1755-263X
1755-263X
DOI:10.1111/conl.12766