Does forest thinning reduce fire severity in Australian eucalypt forests?
Forest thinning has been proposed to reduce fire severity. However, evidence to support this strategy in Australia is scant. We completed a detailed empirical analysis of stand history data from forests burned in wildfires in 2009 in south‐eastern Australia, to address the question: Does forest thin...
Saved in:
Published in | Conservation letters Vol. 14; no. 2 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.03.2021
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1755-263X 1755-263X |
DOI | 10.1111/conl.12766 |
Cover
Summary: | Forest thinning has been proposed to reduce fire severity. However, evidence to support this strategy in Australia is scant. We completed a detailed empirical analysis of stand history data from forests burned in wildfires in 2009 in south‐eastern Australia, to address the question: Does forest thinning reduce fire severity? The answer varied depending on fire type (Crown Burn vs. Crown Burn/Crown Scorch), forest type, and stand age. For the statistical relationship for Crown Burn, there were no thinning effects in ash‐type forests. For mixed species forests, thinning reduced the probability of Crown Burn in young stands but increased it in older stands. Data for the fire severity category of Crown Burn/Crown Scorch revealed that thinning generally elevated fire severity, irrespective of stand age, forest type, or fire zone. Except for 20‐ to 40‐year‐old mixed species forest subject to Crown Burn, proposals for thinning to reduce fire severity have limited support. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1755-263X 1755-263X |
DOI: | 10.1111/conl.12766 |