Benchmarking KDP in rainfall: a quantitative assessment of estimation algorithms using C-band weather radar observations

• Published in: Atmospheric measurement techniques Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 793 - 816
• Main Authors: Aldana, Miguel, Pulkkinen, Seppo, Annakaisa von Lerber, Kumjian, Matthew R, Moisseev, Dmitri
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 13.02.2025; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Atmospheric radiation; Atmospheric radiation measurements; C band; Calibration; Classification; Data quality control; Datasets; Downward long wave radiation; Errors; Estimates; Estimation errors; Meteorological radar; Methods; Noise reduction; Parameter estimation; Performance evaluation; Precipitation; Precipitation estimation; Python; Quality control; Radar; Radar data; Radiation measurement; Rain; Rainfall; Reflectance; Variables; Weather; Weather radar; Vantaa Finland; Finland
• ISSN: 1867-1381; 1867-8548; 1867-8548
• DOI: 10.5194/amt-18-793-2025

Accurate and precise KDP estimates are essential for radar-based applications, especially in quantitative precipitation estimation and radar data quality control routines. The accuracy of these estimates largely depends on the post-processing of the radar's measured ΦDP, which aims to reduce noise and backscattering effects while preserving fine-scale precipitation features. In this study, we evaluate the performance of several publicly available KDP estimation methods implemented in open-source libraries such as Py-ART (the Python ARM (atmospheric radiation measurement) Radar Toolkit) and ωradlib and the method used in the Vaisala weather radars. To benchmark these methods, we employ a polarimetric self-consistency approach that relates KDP to reflectivity and differential reflectivity in rain, providing a reference self-consistent KDP (KDPsc) for comparison. This approach allows for the construction of the reference KDP observations that can be used to assess the accuracy and robustness of the studied KDP estimation methods. We assess each method by quantifying uncertainties using C-band weather radar observations, where the reflectivity values ranged between 20 and 50 dBZ.Using the proposed evaluation framework, we were able to define optimized parameter settings for the methods that have user-configurable parameters. Most of these methods showed a significant reduction in the estimation errors after the optimization, with respect to the default settings. We have found significant differences in the performance of the studied methods, where the best-performing methods showed smaller normalized biases in the high reflectivity values (i.e., ≥ 40 dBZ) and overall smaller normalized root-mean-square errors across the range of reflectivity values.