Characteristics and Clinical Course of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and ST-segment Elevation with and without Interatrial Block
Foundation: it is novel to establish the relationship between interatrial block and acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation due to the few studies that address the subject. Objective: to evaluate the characteristics and clinical evolution of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myo...
Saved in:
Published in | Finlay Vol. 13; no. 3; pp. 282 - 292 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Spanish |
Published |
Universidad de las Ciencias Médicas de Cienfuegos
01.08.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2221-2434 |
Cover
Summary: | Foundation: it is novel to establish the relationship between interatrial block and acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation due to the few studies that address the subject.
Objective: to evaluate the characteristics and clinical evolution of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction with and without interatrial block.
Methods: a descriptive and correlational study was carried out in progressive care units of the Dr. Gustavo Aldereguía Lima University General Hospital in Cienfuegos. 169 subjects with a diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction divided into two groups with and without interatrial block were selected. Demographic variables were analyzed: age, sex, skin color and between clinics: toxic habits; (smoker, ex-smoker); medical history (myocardial infarction, angina, peripheral arterial disease, arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease; infarct location (anterior, inferior, left bundle branch block); complications: heart failure, atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, atrioventricular conduction disorders, mechanical complication, post infarction angina, arterial embolism) and discharge status (alive or deceased).
Results: 52.17 % of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with interatrial block developed heart failure, vs 29.45 % among patients without block with statistical significance (p = 0.03). The relationship between the occurrence or not of complications (as well as the state at discharge) and the presence or not of blockade was highly significant (p=0.01).
Conclusions: the detailed analysis, in this context, of the p wave of the electrocardiogram should be routine, since the documentation of interatrial block could be related to the clinical course of the patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2221-2434 |