B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures promote immunotherapy response
Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer therapy. Until now, predictive biomarkers 1 – 10 and strategies to augment clinical response have largely focused on the T cell compartment. However, other immune subsets may also contribute to anti-tumour immunity 11 – 15 , a...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature (London) Vol. 577; no. 7791; pp. 549 - 555 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
23.01.2020
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0028-0836 1476-4687 1476-4687 |
DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-1922-8 |
Cover
Summary: | Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer therapy. Until now, predictive biomarkers
1
–
10
and strategies to augment clinical response have largely focused on the T cell compartment. However, other immune subsets may also contribute to anti-tumour immunity
11
–
15
, although these have been less well-studied in ICB treatment
16
. A previously conducted neoadjuvant ICB trial in patients with melanoma showed via targeted expression profiling
17
that B cell signatures were enriched in the tumours of patients who respond to treatment versus non-responding patients. To build on this, here we performed bulk RNA sequencing and found that B cell markers were the most differentially expressed genes in the tumours of responders versus non-responders. Our findings were corroborated using a computational method (MCP-counter
18
) to estimate the immune and stromal composition in this and two other ICB-treated cohorts (patients with melanoma and renal cell carcinoma). Histological evaluation highlighted the localization of B cells within tertiary lymphoid structures. We assessed the potential functional contributions of B cells via bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing, which demonstrate clonal expansion and unique functional states of B cells in responders. Mass cytometry showed that switched memory B cells were enriched in the tumours of responders. Together, these data provide insights into the potential role of B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures in the response to ICB treatment, with implications for the development of biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Multiomic profiling of several cohorts of patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade highlights the presence and potential role of B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures in promoting therapy response. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Author contributions B.A.H., S.M.R., J.G., S.Z. and R.B. contributed equally. Jointly supervising authors include P.S., K.R., M.T.T., L.W. and J.A.W. Corresponding authors are B.A.H. and J.A.W. J.A.W. designed the study. J.E.G., R.N.A., P.H., M.A.D., H.A.T., S.P., A.L., S. Woodman, C.U.B., T.N.S., P.S. and J.A.W. collected samples for correlative analyses. B.A.H., S.M.R., J.G., S.Z., R.B., R.T., K.Y., M.S.-F., J.B., G.H., V.G., Y.X., H.Z., A.P.C., W.L., V.S.L., F.G.K., A.L., R.A., S. Woodman, E.Z.K., P.-O.G., A.R., C.N.S., E.M.B., L.E.H., A.J.L., R.Z., C.W.H., D.A.L., S.O., M.B., S. Warren, D.R., O.K., E.A.R., D.P., C.U.B., T.N.S., L.H.B., M.A.Z., K.M.M., R.K., J.A., F.P., W.H.F., C.S.-F. and N.H. analysed and interpreted data. Specifically, K.Y., M.S.F. and N.H. assisted with single-cell RNA-seq analyses. S.O., M.B. and S. Warren assisted with Nanostring Digital Spatial Profiling analyses. R.B. and K.R. assisted with CyTOF. S.Z., R.T., L.W., M.A.Z. and K.M.M. assisted with BCR analyses. J.B., S.O., M.B., S. Warren, C.H., D.L. and M.T.T. assisted with singlet and multifocal immunohistochemistry. S.Z., L.W., J.E.G. and A.J.L. assisted with analyses of the TCGA patient cohorts. S.Z., R.T. and L.W. assisted with all bioinformatics and statistical analyses. R.T. performed pathway analyses. V.S.L., F.G.K. and R.K. assisted with analyses of exosomes. D.R., O.K., E.A.R., D.P., C.U.B. and T.N.S. provided assistance with analyses of patients from the OpACIN-neo trial. J.G., J.B. and P.S. assisted with analyses of the RCC patient cohort. All authors developed and approved the manuscript. |
ISSN: | 0028-0836 1476-4687 1476-4687 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41586-019-1922-8 |