Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and K-RAS status in two cohorts of squamous cell carcinomas
Background With the availability of effective anti-EGFR therapies for various solid malignancies, such as non-cell small lung cancer, colorectal cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, the knowledge of EGFR and K-RAS status becomes clinically important. The aim of this study was to...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC cancer Vol. 10; no. 1; p. 189 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
11.05.2010
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1471-2407 1471-2407 |
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-189 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
With the availability of effective anti-EGFR therapies for various solid malignancies, such as non-cell small lung cancer, colorectal cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, the knowledge of
EGFR
and
K-RAS
status becomes clinically important. The aim of this study was to analyse EGFR expression,
EGFR
gene copy number and
EGFR
and
K-RAS
mutations in two cohorts of squamous cell carcinomas, specifically anal canal and tonsil carcinomas.
Methods
Formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from anal and tonsil carcinoma were used. EGFR protein expression and
EGFR
gene copy number were analysed by means of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridisation. The somatic status of the
EGFR
gene was investigated by PCR using primers specific for exons 18 through 21. For the
K-RAS
gene, PCR was performed using exon 2 specific primers.
Results
EGFR immunoreactivity was present in 36/43 (83.7%) of anal canal and in 20/24 (83.3%) of tonsil squamous cell carcinomas.
EGFR
amplification was absent in anal canal tumours (0/23), but could be identified in 4 of 24 tonsil tumours.
From 38 anal canal specimens, 26 specimens were successfully analysed for exon 18, 30 for exon 19, 34 for exon 20 and 30 for exon 21. No
EGFR
mutations were found in the investigated samples. Thirty samples were sequenced for
K-RAS
exon 2 and no mutation was identified. From 24 tonsil specimens, 22 were successfully analysed for exon 18 and all 24 specimens for exon 19, 20 and 21. No
EGFR
mutations were found. Twenty-two samples were sequenced for
K-RAS
exon 2 and one mutation c.53C > A was identified.
Conclusion
EGFR
mutations were absent from squamous cell carcinoma of the anus and tonsils, but EGFR protein expression was detected in the majority of the cases. EGFR amplification was seen in tonsil but not in anal canal carcinomas. In our investigated panel, only one mutation in the
K-RAS
gene of a tonsil squamous cell carcinoma was identified. This indicates that
EGFR
and
K-RAS
mutation analysis is not useful as a screening test for sensitivity to anti-EGFR therapy in anal canal and tonsil squamous cell carcinoma. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1471-2407 1471-2407 |
DOI: | 10.1186/1471-2407-10-189 |