Polygenic dissection of diagnosis and clinical dimensions of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia
Bipolar disorder and schizophrenia are two often severe disorders with high heritabilities. Recent studies have demonstrated a large overlap of genetic risk loci between these disorders but diagnostic and molecular distinctions still remain. Here, we perform a combined genome-wide association study...
Saved in:
Published in | Molecular psychiatry Vol. 19; no. 9; pp. 1017 - 1024 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.09.2014
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1359-4184 1476-5578 1476-5578 |
DOI | 10.1038/mp.2013.138 |
Cover
Summary: | Bipolar disorder and schizophrenia are two often severe disorders with high heritabilities. Recent studies have demonstrated a large overlap of genetic risk loci between these disorders but diagnostic and molecular distinctions still remain. Here, we perform a combined genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 19 779 bipolar disorder (BP) and schizophrenia (SCZ) cases versus 19 423 controls, in addition to a direct comparison GWAS of 7129 SCZ cases versus 9252 BP cases. In our case–control analysis, we identify five previously identified regions reaching genome-wide significance (
CACNA1C, IFI44L, MHC, TRANK1
and
MAD1L1
) and a novel locus near
PIK3C2A
. We create a polygenic risk score that is significantly different between BP and SCZ and show a significant correlation between a BP polygenic risk score and the clinical dimension of mania in SCZ patients. Our results indicate that first, combining diseases with similar genetic risk profiles improves power to detect shared risk loci and second, that future direct comparisons of BP and SCZ are likely to identify loci with significant differential effects. Identifying these loci should aid in the fundamental understanding of how these diseases differ biologically. These findings also indicate that combining clinical symptom dimensions and polygenic signatures could provide additional information that may someday be used clinically. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 Individual members are listed in the supplementary material |
ISSN: | 1359-4184 1476-5578 1476-5578 |
DOI: | 10.1038/mp.2013.138 |