Evaluation of the ISO Standard 11063 DNA Extraction Procedure for Assessing Soil Microbial Abundance and Community Structure

Soil DNA extraction has become a critical step in describing microbial biodiversity. Historically, ascertaining overarching microbial ecological theories has been hindered as independent studies have used numerous custom and commercial DNA extraction procedures. For that reason, a standardized soil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 7; no. 9; p. e44279
Main Authors Plassart, Pierre, Terrat, Sébastien, Thomson, Bruce, Griffiths, Robert, Dequiedt, Samuel, Lelievre, Mélanie, Regnier, Tiffanie, Nowak, Virginie, Bailey, Mark, Lemanceau, Philippe, Bispo, Antonio, Chabbi, Abad, Maron, Pierre-Alain, Mougel, Christophe, Ranjard, Lionel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 11.09.2012
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0044279

Cover

More Information
Summary:Soil DNA extraction has become a critical step in describing microbial biodiversity. Historically, ascertaining overarching microbial ecological theories has been hindered as independent studies have used numerous custom and commercial DNA extraction procedures. For that reason, a standardized soil DNA extraction method (ISO-11063) was previously published. However, although this ISO method is suited for molecular tools such as quantitative PCR and community fingerprinting techniques, it has only been optimized for examining soil bacteria. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess an appropriate soil DNA extraction procedure for examining bacterial, archaeal and fungal diversity in soils of contrasting land-use and physico-chemical properties. Three different procedures were tested: the ISO-11063 standard; a custom procedure (GnS-GII); and a modified ISO procedure (ISOm) which includes a different mechanical lysis step (a FastPrep ®-24 lysis step instead of the recommended bead-beating). The efficacy of each method was first assessed by estimating microbial biomass through total DNA quantification. Then, the abundances and community structure of bacteria, archaea and fungi were determined using real-time PCR and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism approaches. Results showed that DNA yield was improved with the GnS-GII and ISOm procedures, and fungal community patterns were found to be strongly dependent on the extraction method. The main methodological factor responsible for differences between extraction procedure efficiencies was found to be the soil homogenization step. For integrative studies which aim to examine bacteria, archaea and fungi simultaneously, the ISOm procedure results in higher DNA recovery and better represents microbial communities.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: PP ST SD PAM CM PL LR. Performed the experiments: BT ML TR VN. Analyzed the data: PP ST RG BT SD ML. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MB AB AC LR. Wrote the paper: PP ST RG BT LR.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0044279