Evaluation of input-output energy use in strawberry production in single-span double-layered greenhouses with different thermal-curtain positions

The large amount of energy required for successful crop production is the main challenge in greenhouse cropping systems. As a response to this challenge a comprehensive evaluation of greenhouse energy consumption was carried out in two structurally similar single-span greenhouses with different ther...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKorean Journal of Agricultural Science Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 437 - 448
Main Authors Akpenpuun, Timothy Denen, Ogunlowo, Qazeem Opeyemi, Rabiu, Anis, Adesanya, Misbaudeen Aderemi, Dutta, Prabhat, Zakir, Ezatullah, Kim, Hyeon-Tae, Lee, Hyun-Woo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 농업과학연구소 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2466-2402
2466-2410
DOI10.7744/kjoas.500309

Cover

More Information
Summary:The large amount of energy required for successful crop production is the main challenge in greenhouse cropping systems. As a response to this challenge a comprehensive evaluation of greenhouse energy consumption was carried out in two structurally similar single-span greenhouses with different thermal curtain positions, with particular attention to energy productivity, specific energy, net energy, and energy ratio. The greenhouses are used for strawberry production. In the R-greenhouse (RGH), the thermal curtain hanged directly at the roof ridge, whereas in the Q-greenhouse (QGH), the thermal curtain was placed 5° from an imaginary vertical axis, from the middle of the roof ridge downwards to the north side of the greenhouse roof. The relevant data were recorded using standard methods. The results indicated that the energy expended in the RGH and QGH systems was 2,186.48 and 2,189.26 MJ/m2, respectively. Electricity and nitrogen fertilizer contributed the highest energy input in both greenhouses and in all seasons. The output energy was 3.12 and 3.82 MJ/m2, respectively, in RGH and QGH in season I and 4.40 and 4.87 MJ/m2 in season II. In terms of energy expended, there was no significant difference between the two greenhouses, nor between the two seasons. These results indicate that greenhouses of the size used in this investigation are not viable in terms of energy productivity, energy-use efficiency, and subsequent economic performance. However, further studies should be conducted to scaleup the information obtained from this investigation. KCI Citation Count: 0
ISSN:2466-2402
2466-2410
DOI:10.7744/kjoas.500309