Development and validation of a Social Images Evaluation Questionnaire for youth in residential care

Social images are defined as prevailing shared ideas about specific groups or societies without concrete or objective evidence of their accuracy or truthfulness. These images frequently have a negative impact on individuals and groups. Although of outmost importance, the study of the social images o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 12; no. 6; p. e0179890
Main Authors Lopes, Diniz, Calheiros, Maria Manuela, Patrício, Joana Nunes, Garrido, Margarida Vaz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 29.06.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0179890

Cover

More Information
Summary:Social images are defined as prevailing shared ideas about specific groups or societies without concrete or objective evidence of their accuracy or truthfulness. These images frequently have a negative impact on individuals and groups. Although of outmost importance, the study of the social images of youth in residential care is still scarce. In this article we present two studies for the development and validation of the Social Images Evaluation Questionnaire (SIEQ). In study 1, participants were asked to freely generate words that could be associated to youth in residential care in order to obtain a list of attributes to be used in the SIEQ. In study 2, the main psychometric characteristics of the SIEQ were tested with samples of laypeople and professionals. The main results support the proposal of a new and psychometrically sound measurement-the SIEQ-to analyze the social images of youth in residential care.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Conceptualization: DL MMC JNP MVG.Data curation: DL.Formal analysis: DL MMC MVG.Funding acquisition: MMC MVG.Investigation: DL MMC JNP MVG.Methodology: DL MMC MVG.Project administration: MMC.Supervision: MMC.Validation: DL.Visualization: DL.Writing – original draft: DL MMC JNP MVG.Writing – review & editing: DL MMC JNP MVG.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0179890