Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review

• Published in: The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 115 - 511
• Main Authors: Lee, Paul H, Macfarlane, Duncan J, Lam, TH, Stewart, Sunita M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 21.10.2011; BioMed Central Ltd; BMC
• Subjects: Behavioral Sciences; Clinical Nutrition; Exercise; Health aspects; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; Humans; Lifestyles; measuring devices; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Physical Exertion; Physical Fitness; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of Results; Review; Surveys and Questionnaires; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards; systematic review; Validation Studies as Topic; Validity; Walking; United States; Hong Kong, China; International Physical Activity Questionnaire; Accelerometer Data; Total Physical Activity; Physical Activity; Vigorous Activity
• ISSN: 1479-5868; 1479-5868
• DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-115

Background The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) has been recommended as a cost-effective method to assess physical activity. Several studies validating the IPAQ-SF have been conducted with differing results, but no systematic review of these studies has been reported. Methods The keywords "IPAQ", "validation", and "validity" were searched in PubMed and Scopus. Studies published in English that validated the IPAQ-SF against an objective physical activity measuring device, doubly labeled water, or an objective fitness measure were included. Results Twenty-three validation studies were included in this review. There was a great deal of variability in the methods used across studies, but the results were largely similar. Correlations between the total physical activity level measured by the IPAQ-SF and objective standards ranged from 0.09 to 0.39; none reached the minimal acceptable standard in the literature (0.50 for objective activity measuring devices, 0.40 for fitness measures). Correlations between sections of the IPAQ-SF for vigorous activity or moderate activity level/walking and an objective standard showed even greater variability (-0.18 to 0.76), yet several reached the minimal acceptable standard. Only six studies provided comparisons between physical activity levels derived from the IPAQ-SF and those obtained from objective criterion. In most studies the IPAQ-SF overestimated physical activity level by 36 to 173 percent; one study underestimated by 28 percent. Conclusions The correlation between the IPAQ-SF and objective measures of activity or fitness in the large majority of studies was lower than the acceptable standard. Furthermore, the IPAQ-SF typically overestimated physical activity as measured by objective criterion by an average of 84 percent. Hence, the evidence to support the use of the IPAQ-SF as an indicator of relative or absolute physical activity is weak.