A Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Analysis of 10 LDL Subfractions, and Their Response to Statin Treatment, in 1868 Caucasians

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 10; no. 4; p. e0120758
• Main Authors: Shim, Heejung, Chasman, Daniel I., Smith, Joshua D., Mora, Samia, Ridker, Paul M., Nickerson, Deborah A., Krauss, Ronald M., Stephens, Matthew
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 21.04.2015; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Aged; Analysis; Apolipoprotein E; Apolipoproteins; Association analysis; Bayes Theorem; Blood lipids; Cardiovascular agents; Cardiovascular disease; Cardiovascular diseases; Computer programs; Disease prevention; European Continental Ancestry Group; Female; Gel electrophoresis; Genome, Human; Genome-Wide Association Study; Genomes; Health risks; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors - therapeutic use; Lipoprotein A; Lipoproteins; Lipoproteins (low density); Lipoproteins, LDL - genetics; Low density lipoprotein; Low density lipoproteins; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate analysis; Pharmacogenomics; Pharmacology; Phenotype; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide - genetics; Single nucleotide polymorphisms; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Statins; Studies
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120758

We conducted a genome-wide association analysis of 7 subfractions of low density lipoproteins (LDLs) and 3 subfractions of intermediate density lipoproteins (IDLs) measured by gradient gel electrophoresis, and their response to statin treatment, in 1868 individuals of European ancestry from the Pharmacogenomics and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease study. Our analyses identified four previously-implicated loci (SORT1, APOE, LPA, and CETP) as containing variants that are very strongly associated with lipoprotein subfractions (log(10)Bayes Factor > 15). Subsequent conditional analyses suggest that three of these (APOE, LPA and CETP) likely harbor multiple independently associated SNPs. Further, while different variants typically showed different characteristic patterns of association with combinations of subfractions, the two SNPs in CETP show strikingly similar patterns--both in our original data and in a replication cohort--consistent with a common underlying molecular mechanism. Notably, the CETP variants are very strongly associated with LDL subfractions, despite showing no association with total LDLs in our study, illustrating the potential value of the more detailed phenotypic measurements. In contrast with these strong subfraction associations, genetic association analysis of subfraction response to statins showed much weaker signals (none exceeding log(10)Bayes Factor of 6). However, two SNPs (in APOE and LPA) previously-reported to be associated with LDL statin response do show some modest evidence for association in our data, and the subfraction response proles at the LPA SNP are consistent with the LPA association, with response likely being due primarily to resistance of Lp(a) particles to statin therapy. An additional important feature of our analysis is that, unlike most previous analyses of multiple related phenotypes, we analyzed the subfractions jointly, rather than one at a time. Comparisons of our multivariate analyses with standard univariate analyses demonstrate that multivariate analyses can substantially increase power to detect associations. Software implementing our multivariate analysis methods is available at http://stephenslab.uchicago.edu/software.html.