Artificial intelligence algorithm for predicting mortality of patients with acute heart failure

This study aimed to develop and validate deep-learning-based artificial intelligence algorithm for predicting mortality of AHF (DAHF). 12,654 dataset from 2165 patients with AHF in two hospitals were used as train data for DAHF development, and 4759 dataset from 4759 patients with AHF in 10 hospital...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 14; no. 7; p. e0219302
Main Authors Kwon, Joon-myoung, Kim, Kyung-Hee, Jeon, Ki-Hyun, Lee, Sang Eun, Lee, Hae-Young, Cho, Hyun-Jai, Choi, Jin Oh, Jeon, Eun-Seok, Kim, Min-Seok, Kim, Jae-Joong, Hwang, Kyung-Kuk, Chae, Shung Chull, Baek, Sang Hong, Kang, Seok-Min, Choi, Dong-Ju, Yoo, Byung-Su, Kim, Kye Hun, Park, Hyun-Young, Cho, Myeong-Chan, Oh, Byung-Hee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 08.07.2019
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0219302

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study aimed to develop and validate deep-learning-based artificial intelligence algorithm for predicting mortality of AHF (DAHF). 12,654 dataset from 2165 patients with AHF in two hospitals were used as train data for DAHF development, and 4759 dataset from 4759 patients with AHF in 10 hospitals enrolled to the Korean AHF registry were used as performance test data. The endpoints were in-hospital, 12-month, and 36-month mortality. We compared the DAHF performance with the Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) score, Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score, and other machine-learning models by using the test data. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the DAHF were 0.880 (95% confidence interval, 0.876-0.884) for predicting in-hospital mortality; these results significantly outperformed those of the GWTG-HF (0.728 [0.720-0.737]) and other machine-learning models. For predicting 12- and 36-month endpoints, DAHF (0.782 and 0.813) significantly outperformed MAGGIC score (0.718 and 0.729). During the 36-month follow-up, the high-risk group, defined by the DAHF, had a significantly higher mortality rate than the low-risk group(p<0.001). DAHF predicted the in-hospital and long-term mortality of patients with AHF more accurately than the existing risk scores and other machine-learning models.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0219302