Neurosurgeon academic impact is associated with clinical outcomes after clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms

Surgeon-dependent factors such as experience and volume are associated with patient outcomes. However, it is unknown whether a surgeon's research productivity could be related to outcomes. The main aim of this study is to investigate the association between the surgeon's academic productiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 12; no. 7; p. e0181521
Main Authors Alotaibi, Naif M., Ibrahim, George M., Wang, Justin, Guha, Daipayan, Mamdani, Muhammad, Schweizer, Tom A., Macdonald, R. Loch
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 20.07.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0181521

Cover

More Information
Summary:Surgeon-dependent factors such as experience and volume are associated with patient outcomes. However, it is unknown whether a surgeon's research productivity could be related to outcomes. The main aim of this study is to investigate the association between the surgeon's academic productivity and clinical outcomes following neurosurgical clipping of ruptured aneurysms. We performed a post-hoc analysis of 3567 patients who underwent clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the randomized trials of tirilazad mesylate from 1990 to 1997. These trials included 162 centers and 156 surgeons from 21 countries. Primary and secondary outcomes were: Glasgow outcome scale score and mortality, respectively. Total publications, H-index, and graduate degrees were used as academic indicators for each surgeon. The association between outcomes and academic factors were assessed using a hierarchical logistic regression analysis, adjusting for patient covariates. Academic profiles were available for 147 surgeons, treating a total of 3307 patients. Most surgeons were from the USA (62, 42%), Canada (18, 12%), and Germany (15, 10%). On univariate analysis, the H-index correlated with better functional outcomes and lower mortality rates. In the multivariate model, patients under the care of surgeons with higher H-indices demonstrated improved neurological outcomes (p = 0.01) compared to surgeons with lower H-indices, without any significant difference in mortality. None of the other academic indicators were significantly associated with outcomes. Although prognostication following surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms primarily depends on clinical and radiological factors, the academic impact of the operating neurosurgeon may explain some heterogeneity in surgical outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: RLM receives grant support from the Physicians Services Incorporated Foundation, the Brain Aneurysm Foundation, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and is the chief scientific officer of Edge Therapeutics, Inc. (Berkeley Heights, NJ, USA). To the best of our knowledge, no conflict of interest, financial or other, exists. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Conceptualization: NMA GMI.Formal analysis: NMA GMI JW DG MM TAS RLM.Investigation: NMA GMI.Resources: NMA GMI JW DG MM TAS RLM.Supervision: RLM.Writing – original draft: NMA GMI JW DG.Writing – review & editing: MM TAS RLM.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0181521