Machine learning-based glucose prediction with use of continuous glucose and physical activity monitoring data: The Maastricht Study

Closed-loop insulin delivery systems, which integrate continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and algorithms that continuously guide insulin dosing, have been shown to improve glycaemic control. The ability to predict future glucose values can further optimize such devices. In this study, we used machin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 16; no. 6; p. e0253125
Main Authors van Doorn, William P. T. M., Foreman, Yuri D., Schaper, Nicolaas C., Savelberg, Hans H. C. M., Koster, Annemarie, van der Kallen, Carla J. H., Wesselius, Anke, Schram, Miranda T., Henry, Ronald M. A., Dagnelie, Pieter C., de Galan, Bastiaan E., Bekers, Otto, Stehouwer, Coen D. A., Meex, Steven J. R., Brouwers, Martijn C. G. J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 24.06.2021
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0253125

Cover

More Information
Summary:Closed-loop insulin delivery systems, which integrate continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and algorithms that continuously guide insulin dosing, have been shown to improve glycaemic control. The ability to predict future glucose values can further optimize such devices. In this study, we used machine learning to train models in predicting future glucose levels based on prior CGM and accelerometry data. We used data from The Maastricht Study, an observational population-based cohort that comprises individuals with normal glucose metabolism, prediabetes, or type 2 diabetes. We included individuals who underwent >48h of CGM (n = 851), most of whom (n = 540) simultaneously wore an accelerometer to assess physical activity. A random subset of individuals was used to train models in predicting glucose levels at 15- and 60-minute intervals based on either CGM data or both CGM and accelerometer data. In the remaining individuals, model performance was evaluated with root-mean-square error (RMSE), Spearman's correlation coefficient (rho) and surveillance error grid. For a proof-of-concept translation, CGM-based prediction models were optimized and validated with the use of data from individuals with type 1 diabetes (OhioT1DM Dataset, n = 6). Models trained with CGM data were able to accurately predict glucose values at 15 (RMSE: 0.19mmol/L; rho: 0.96) and 60 minutes (RMSE: 0.59mmol/L, rho: 0.72). Model performance was comparable in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Incorporation of accelerometer data only slightly improved prediction. The error grid results indicated that model predictions were clinically safe (15 min: >99%, 60 min >98%). Our prediction models translated well to individuals with type 1 diabetes, which is reflected by high accuracy (RMSEs for 15 and 60 minutes of 0.43 and 1.73 mmol/L, respectively) and clinical safety (15 min: >99%, 60 min: >91%). Machine learning-based models are able to accurately and safely predict glucose values at 15- and 60-minute intervals based on CGM data only. Future research should further optimize the models for implementation in closed-loop insulin delivery systems.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Competing Interests: This study received funding from Janssen-Cilag B.V, Novo Nordisk Farma B.V., Sanofi-Aventis Netherlands B.V and Medtronic. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors. N.C. Schaper, R.M.A. Henry, and M.C.G.J. Brouwers were supported by Medtronic (External Research Program). Medtronic did not direct design, conduct, or outcomes of this study. The authors declare that there are no other relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work.
These authors also contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0253125