On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations

Three primary hypotheses currently prevail for correlations between heterozygosity at a set of molecular markers and fitness in natural populations. First, multilocus heterozygosity–fitness correlations might result from selection acting directly on the scored loci, such as at particular allozyme lo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular ecology Vol. 11; no. 12; pp. 2467 - 2474
Main Authors Hansson, Bengt, Westerberg, Lars
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.12.2002
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0962-1083
1365-294X
1365-294X
DOI10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01644.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:Three primary hypotheses currently prevail for correlations between heterozygosity at a set of molecular markers and fitness in natural populations. First, multilocus heterozygosity–fitness correlations might result from selection acting directly on the scored loci, such as at particular allozyme loci. Second, significant levels of linkage disequilibrium, as in recently bottlenecked‐and‐expanded populations, might cause associations between the markers and fitness loci in the local chromosomal vicinity. Third, in partially inbred populations, heterozygosity at the markers might reflect variation in the inbreeding coefficient and might associate with fitness as a result of effects of homozygosity at genome‐wide distributed loci. Despite years of research, the relative importance of these hypotheses remains unclear. The screening of heterozygosity at polymorphic DNA markers offers an opportunity to resolve this issue, and relevant empirical studies have now emerged. We provide an account of the recent progress on the subject, and give suggestions on how to distinguish between the three hypotheses in future studies.
Bibliography:istex:A55B6F63B811909F31482E6AF9E7B1B7157DDA55
ArticleID:MEC1644
ark:/67375/WNG-LB9X2VX2-T
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
ISSN:0962-1083
1365-294X
1365-294X
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01644.x