The relationship between visual function and physical performance in the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA)

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 18; no. 9; p. e0292079
• Main Authors: Thompson, Atalie C., Johnson, Eileen, Miller, Michael E., Williamson, Jeff D., Newman, Anne B., Cummings, Steve, Cawthon, Peggy, Kritchevsky, Stephen B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Francisco Public Library of Science 27.09.2023; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Acuity; Adults; Aging; Analysis; Balance; Batteries; Biology and Life Sciences; Biopsy; Blindness; Cataracts; Cohort analysis; Coordination; Diagnosis; Disease; Exercise tests; Eye diseases; Gait; Glaucoma; Grip strength; Health aspects; Leg; Macular degeneration; Medicine and Health Sciences; Mobility; Mortality; Muscle strength; Older people; Regression analysis; Regression models; Risk factors; Self report; Sensitivity; Sensitivity analysis; Social Sciences; Task complexity; Visual acuity; Visual aspects; Visual perception; United States; Illinois; United States > US; Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292079

Purpose The relationship of types of visual function to different aspects of physical function, especially strength and coordination, has been understudied, but delineation of these relationships could suggest potentially modifiable targets prior to the onset of disability. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of visual function (self-reported eyesight and eye disease, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity) and physical function tests in 877 older adults (mean age 76.36±5.01 years, 59.2% women, and 13.3% Black race). Separate linear regression models were constructed for short physical performance battery (SPPB), expanded SPPB (eSPPB), their components (gait speed, chair stand, balance, narrow walk), stair climb, four-square step, leg extension peak power and strength, and grip strength. Results In adjusted models, worse acuity, worse contrast sensitivity, and self-reported poor vision were significantly associated with worse performance on the eSPPB and four-square step test. Worse contrast sensitivity, but not acuity, was significantly associated with shorter balance times, slower chair stand pace, longer stair climb time, and worse SPPB score. Associations of worse acuity and contrast sensitivity with weaker leg extension power, leg strength, and grip strength were attenuated by covariate adjustment. Self-reported macular degeneration, but not cataract or glaucoma, was associated with worse performance on SPPB, eSPPB, balance, stair climb, and four-square step tests in adjusted models. Worse contrast sensitivity and macular degeneration remained associated with worse SPPB and balance after controlling for visual acuity and self-reported eyesight. Conclusions Poor contrast sensitivity was more strongly associated with worse physical performance than acuity, especially for complex tasks that dynamically challenge coordination and balance. Future studies should examine if older adults with contrast sensitivity impairment would benefit from targeted intervention to decrease their risk of disability.