Non-invasive ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, including COVID-19

Optimal initial non-invasive management of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), of both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 etiologies, has been the subject of significant discussion. Avoidance of endotracheal intubation reduces related complications, but maintenance of spont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of intensive medicine Vol. 3; no. 1; pp. 11 - 19
Main Authors Rosà, Tommaso, Menga, Luca Salvatore, Tejpal, Ambika, Cesarano, Melania, Michi, Teresa, Sklar, Michael C., Grieco, Domenico Luca
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published China Elsevier B.V 31.01.2023
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Medical Association
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2667-100X
2667-100X
DOI10.1016/j.jointm.2022.08.006

Cover

More Information
Summary:Optimal initial non-invasive management of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), of both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 etiologies, has been the subject of significant discussion. Avoidance of endotracheal intubation reduces related complications, but maintenance of spontaneous breathing with intense respiratory effort may increase risks of patients’ self-inflicted lung injury, leading to delayed intubation and worse clinical outcomes. High-flow nasal oxygen is currently recommended as the optimal strategy for AHRF management for its simplicity and beneficial physiological effects. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV), delivered as either pressure support or continuous positive airway pressure via interfaces like face masks and helmets, can improve oxygenation and may be associated with reduced endotracheal intubation rates. However, treatment failure is common and associated with poor outcomes. Expertise and knowledge of the specific features of each interface are necessary to fully exploit their potential benefits and minimize risks. Strict clinical and physiological monitoring is necessary during any treatment to avoid delays in endotracheal intubation and protective ventilation. In this narrative review, we analyze the physiological benefits and risks of spontaneous breathing in AHRF, and the characteristics of tools for delivering NIV. The goal herein is to provide a contemporary, evidence-based overview of this highly relevant topic.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2667-100X
2667-100X
DOI:10.1016/j.jointm.2022.08.006