Cut-off point for the trail making test to predict unsafe driving after stroke

[Purpose] This study examined the cut-off point of the Trail Making Test in predictingthe risk of unsafe driving in stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 81 strokepatients with a driver’s license participated in this study. The DriveABLE CognitiveAssessment Tool, Trail Making Test-A, an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Physical Therapy Science Vol. 28; no. 7; pp. 2110 - 2113
Main Authors Lee, Jae Shin, Oh, Young Ju, Choi, Seong Youl
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Society of Physical Therapy Science 01.01.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0915-5287
2187-5626
DOI10.1589/jpts.28.2110

Cover

More Information
Summary:[Purpose] This study examined the cut-off point of the Trail Making Test in predictingthe risk of unsafe driving in stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 81 strokepatients with a driver’s license participated in this study. The DriveABLE CognitiveAssessment Tool, Trail Making Test-A, and Trail Making Test-B evaluations were conductedin all participants. All participants were classified into the safety or risk groups basedon the DriveABLE Cognitive Assessment Tool evaluation results. The Trail Making Testresults underwent a receiver operating characteristic analysis in each group. [Results]The results of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that thecut-off point for Trail Making Test-A was 32 seconds and the cut-off point for TrailMaking Test-B was 79 seconds. The positive predictive values of the Trail Making Test-Aand Trail Making Test-B were 98.3% and 98.3%, respectively, and the negative predictivevalues of the Trail Making Test-A and Trail Making Test-B were 81.0% and 73.9%,respectively. [Conclusion] The Trail Making Test is a useful tool for predicting the riskof unsafe driving in stroke patients. This tool is expected to be used more actively forscreening stroke drivers with respect to their cognitive function.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0915-5287
2187-5626
DOI:10.1589/jpts.28.2110