Rapid recurrent processing gates awareness in primary visual cortex

Visual awareness has been proposed to depend on recurrent processing in early visual cortex areas including the primary visual cortex (V1). Here, we address this hypothesis with high spatiotemporal resolution magnetoencephalographic recordings in subjects performing a substitution masking paradigm....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 105; no. 25; pp. 8742 - 8747
Main Authors Boehler, C.N, Schoenfeld, M.A, Heinze, H.-J, Hopf, J.-M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 24.06.2008
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI10.1073/pnas.0801999105

Cover

More Information
Summary:Visual awareness has been proposed to depend on recurrent processing in early visual cortex areas including the primary visual cortex (V1). Here, we address this hypothesis with high spatiotemporal resolution magnetoencephalographic recordings in subjects performing a substitution masking paradigm. Neural activity reflecting awareness is assessed by directly comparing the neuromagnetic response elicited by effectively and ineffectively masked targets after the proportion of trials leading to masking was individually adjusted to match the proportion of trials without masking. This revealed a modulation of recurrent activity in the primary visual cortex rapidly after the onset of the feedforward sweep of processing in striate and extrastriate areas but significantly before the onset of attention-dependent recurrent modulations in V1. Our data provide direct support for the notion that (i) recurrent processing in V1 correlates with visual awareness and (ii) that attention and awareness involve distinct recurrent processing operations.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: C.N.B., M.A.S., H.-J.H., and J.-M.H. designed research; C.N.B. performed research; C.N.B., M.A.S., and J.-M.H. analyzed data; and J.-M.H. wrote the paper.
Edited by Michael I. Posner, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, and approved May 1, 2008
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.0801999105