1150-P: Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Renal Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Proteinuria

Background: The impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and proteinuria remains unclear. Methods: A search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Databases through 11/2/2018 was performed....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 68; no. Supplement_1
Main Authors COLEMAN, CRAIG I., WEEDA, ERIN R., KHARAT, AKSHAY A., BOOKHART, BRAHIM, BAKER, WILLIAM L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York American Diabetes Association 01.06.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0012-1797
1939-327X
DOI10.2337/db19-1150-P

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background: The impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and proteinuria remains unclear. Methods: A search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Databases through 11/2/2018 was performed. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of T2D patients and micro- or macroalbuminuria; comparing an ACEI or ARB with placebo, placebo+background antihypertensives or non-ACEI or ARB containing antihypertensives; randomizing ≥100 subjects; and following subjects for ≥12 months. Endpoints included doubling of serum creatinine (SCr), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality and progression and regression of proteinuria. A Hartung-Knapp random-effects model producing a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was employed, with between-study variance calculated using the Paule-Mandel estimator. Results: The use of an ACE inhibitor or ARB was not associated with a significant reduction in the risk of a doubling in SCr (n=7 trials, RR=0.77, 95% CI=0.50-1.21). ACE inhibitors or ARBs reduced the risk of progressing to ESRD (n=8, RR=0.79, 95CI=0.75-0.83). No difference in all-cause (n=11, RR=0.98, 95% CI=0.89-1.08) or CV mortality (n=6 trials, RR=1.08, 95% CI=0.92-1.28), nor the composite outcome of doubling SCr, development of ESRD or mortality (n=3 trials, RR=0.87, 95% CI=0.72-1.06) were observed. The risk of progression of patients’ proteinuria was decreased when an ACE inhibitor or ARB was used versus control (n=10, RR=0.49, 95% CI=0.33-0.74). The chance of regression of patients’ proteinuria was not significantly improved with an ACE inhibitor or ARB (n=11, RR=1.55, 95% CI=0.93-2.58). Conclusion: ACEIs and ARBs may reduce the risk of ESRD and slow progression of nephropathy, but do not appear to decrease all-cause or CV mortality in T2D patients with proteinuria.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Conference Proceeding-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0012-1797
1939-327X
DOI:10.2337/db19-1150-P