The birth of a human-specific neural gene by incomplete duplication and gene fusion
Background Gene innovation by duplication is a fundamental evolutionary process but is difficult to study in humans due to the large size, high sequence identity, and mosaic nature of segmental duplication blocks. The human-specific gene hydrocephalus-inducing 2, HYDIN2 , was generated by a 364 kbp...
Saved in:
Published in | Genome Biology Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 49 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
09.03.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1474-760X 1474-7596 1474-760X |
DOI | 10.1186/s13059-017-1163-9 |
Cover
Summary: | Background
Gene innovation by duplication is a fundamental evolutionary process but is difficult to study in humans due to the large size, high sequence identity, and mosaic nature of segmental duplication blocks. The human-specific gene hydrocephalus-inducing 2,
HYDIN2
, was generated by a 364 kbp duplication of 79 internal exons of the large ciliary gene
HYDIN
from chromosome 16q22.2 to chromosome 1q21.1. Because the
HYDIN2
locus lacks the ancestral promoter and seven terminal exons of the progenitor gene, we sought to characterize transcription at this locus by coupling reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and long-read sequencing.
Results
5' RACE indicates a transcription start site for
HYDIN2
outside of the duplication and we observe fusion transcripts spanning both the 5' and 3' breakpoints. We observe extensive splicing diversity leading to the formation of altered open reading frames (ORFs) that appear to be under relaxed selection. We show that
HYDIN2
adopted a new promoter that drives an altered pattern of expression, with highest levels in neural tissues. We estimate that the
HYDIN
duplication occurred ~3.2 million years ago and find that it is nearly fixed (99.9%) for diploid copy number in contemporary humans. Examination of 73 chromosome 1q21 rearrangement patients reveals that
HYDIN2
is deleted or duplicated in most cases.
Conclusions
Together, these data support a model of rapid gene innovation by fusion of incomplete segmental duplications, altered tissue expression, and potential subfunctionalization or neofunctionalization of
HYDIN2
early in the evolution of the
Homo
lineage. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1474-760X 1474-7596 1474-760X |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13059-017-1163-9 |