Comparing Diagnostic Outcomes of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria

Controversy exists regarding the DSM - 5 criteria for ASD. This study tested the psychometric properties of the DSM - 5 model and determined how well it performed across different gender, IQ, and DSM - IV - TR sub-type, using clinically collected data on 227 subjects (median age = 3.95 years, majori...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of autism and developmental disorders Vol. 45; no. 5; pp. 1437 - 1450
Main Authors Harstad, Elizabeth B., Fogler, Jason, Sideridis, Georgios, Weas, Sarah, Mauras, Carrie, Barbaresi, William J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.05.2015
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0162-3257
1573-3432
1573-3432
DOI10.1007/s10803-014-2306-4

Cover

More Information
Summary:Controversy exists regarding the DSM - 5 criteria for ASD. This study tested the psychometric properties of the DSM - 5 model and determined how well it performed across different gender, IQ, and DSM - IV - TR sub-type, using clinically collected data on 227 subjects (median age = 3.95 years, majority had IQ > 70). DSM - 5 was psychometrically superior to the DSM - IV - TR model (Comparative Fit Index of 0.970 vs 0.879, respectively). Measurement invariance revealed good model fit across gender and IQ. Younger children tended to meet fewer diagnostic criteria. Those with autistic disorder were more likely to meet social communication and repetitive behaviors criteria ( p  < .001) than those with PDD-NOS. DSM - 5 is a robust model but will identify a different, albeit overlapping population of individuals compared to DSM - IV - TR .
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0162-3257
1573-3432
1573-3432
DOI:10.1007/s10803-014-2306-4