Validation of a search strategy to identify nutrition trials in PubMed using the relative recall method

• Published in: Journal of clinical epidemiology Vol. 68; no. 6; pp. 610 - 616
• Main Authors: Durão, Solange, Kredo, Tamara, Volmink, Jimmy
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2015; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Clinical Trials as Topic - classification; Confidence Intervals; Cost of Illness; Diet; Disease; Epidemiology; Information Storage and Retrieval - standards; Internal Medicine; Medical Subject Headings-MeSH; Methodology; Methods; Nutrition; Nutrition Disorders - diet therapy; Nutritional Status; PubMed; Reference Standards; Relative recall; Review Literature as Topic; Search strategy development; Sensitivity; Studies; Systematic reviews; Treatment Outcome; Systematic reviews; Sensitivity; Relative recall; Nutrition; Methodology; Search strategy development
• ISSN: 0895-4356; 1878-5921; 1878-5921
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.005

To develop, assess, and maximize the sensitivity of a search strategy to identify diet and nutrition trials in PubMed using relative recall. We developed a search strategy to identify diet and nutrition trials in PubMed. We then constructed a gold standard reference set to validate the identified trials using the relative recall method. Relative recall was calculated by dividing the number of references from the gold standard our search strategy identified by the total number of references in the gold standard. Our gold standard comprised 298 trials, derived from 16 included systematic reviews. The initial search strategy identified 242 of 298 references, with a relative recall of 81.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 76.3%, 85.5%]. We analyzed titles and abstracts of the 56 missed references for possible additional terms. We then modified the search strategy accordingly. The relative recall of the final search strategy was 88.6% (95% CI: 84.4%, 91.9%). We developed a search strategy to identify diet and nutrition trials in PubMed with a high relative recall (sensitivity). This could be useful for establishing a nutrition trials register to support the conduct of future research, including systematic reviews.