Genome-wide association study identifies SESTD1 as a novel risk gene for lithium-responsive bipolar disorder

Lithium is the mainstay prophylactic treatment for bipolar disorder (BD), but treatment response varies considerably across individuals. Patients who respond well to lithium treatment might represent a relatively homogeneous subtype of this genetically and phenotypically diverse disorder. Here, we p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular psychiatry Vol. 21; no. 9; pp. 1290 - 1297
Main Authors Song, J, Bergen, S E, Di Florio, A, Karlsson, R, Charney, A, Ruderfer, D M, Stahl, E A, Chambert, K D, Moran, J L, Gordon-Smith, K, Forty, L, Green, E K, Jones, I, Jones, L, Scolnick, E M, Sklar, P, Smoller, J W, Lichtenstein, P, Hultman, C, Craddock, N, Landén, M, Smoller, Jordan W, Perlis, Roy H, Lee, Phil Hyoun, Castro, Victor M, Hoffnagle, Alison G, Sklar, Pamela, Stahl, Eli A, Purcell, Shaun M, Ruderfer, Douglas M, Charney, Alexander W, Roussos, Panos, Michele Pato, Carlos Pato, Medeiros, Helen, Sobel, Janet, Craddock, Nick, Jones, Ian, Forty, Liz, Florio, Arianna Di, Green, Elaine, Jones, Lisa, Gordon-Smith, Katherine, Landen, Mikael, Hultman, Christina, Jureus, Anders, Bergen, Sarah, McCarroll, Steven, Moran, Jennifer, Chambert, Kimberly, Belliveau, Richard A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.09.2016
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1359-4184
1476-5578
DOI10.1038/mp.2015.165

Cover

More Information
Summary:Lithium is the mainstay prophylactic treatment for bipolar disorder (BD), but treatment response varies considerably across individuals. Patients who respond well to lithium treatment might represent a relatively homogeneous subtype of this genetically and phenotypically diverse disorder. Here, we performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify (i) specific genetic variations influencing lithium response and (ii) genetic variants associated with risk for lithium-responsive BD. Patients with BD and controls were recruited from Sweden and the United Kingdom. GWAS were performed on 2698 patients with subjectively defined (self-reported) lithium response and 1176 patients with objectively defined (clinically documented) lithium response. We next conducted GWAS comparing lithium responders with healthy controls (1639 subjective responders and 8899 controls; 323 objective responders and 6684 controls). Meta-analyses of Swedish and UK results revealed no significant associations with lithium response within the bipolar subjects. However, when comparing lithium-responsive patients with controls, two imputed markers attained genome-wide significant associations, among which one was validated in confirmatory genotyping (rs116323614, P =2.74 × 10 −8 ). It is an intronic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on chromosome 2q31.2 in the gene SEC14 and spectrin domains 1 ( SESTD1 ), which encodes a protein involved in regulation of phospholipids. Phospholipids have been strongly implicated as lithium treatment targets. Furthermore, we estimated the proportion of variance for lithium-responsive BD explained by common variants (‘SNP heritability’) as 0.25 and 0.29 using two definitions of lithium response. Our results revealed a genetic variant in SESTD1 associated with risk for lithium-responsive BD, suggesting that the understanding of BD etiology could be furthered by focusing on this subtype of BD.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Jordan W Smoller (PI), Roy H Perlis, Phil Hyoun Lee, Victor M Castro, Alison G Hoffnagle (Massachusetts General Hospital), Pamela Sklar (PI), Eli A Stahl, Shaun M Purcell, Douglas M Ruderfer, Alexander W Charney, Panos Roussos (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), Carlos Pato Michele Pato, Helen Medeiros, Janet Sobel (University of Southern California), Nick Craddock, Ian Jones, Liz Forty, Arianna Di Florio, Elaine Green (Cardiff University), Lisa Jones, Katherine Gordon-Smith (University of Birmingham), Mikael Landén, Christina Hultman, Anders Juréus, Sarah Bergen (Karolinska Institutet), Steven McCarroll, Jennifer Moran, Jordan W Smoller, Kimberly Chambert, Richard A Belliveau Jr. (Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute)
ISSN:1359-4184
1476-5578
DOI:10.1038/mp.2015.165