Assessment of transcript reconstruction methods for RNA-seq

The RGASP consortium compared 25 RNA-seq analysis programs in their ability to identify exons, reconstruct transcripts and quantify expression levels. Assembly of isoforms and their expression levels in higher eukaryotes remains a challenge. We evaluated 25 protocol variants of 14 independent comput...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature methods Vol. 10; no. 12; pp. 1177 - 1184
Main Authors Steijger, Tamara, Abril, Josep F, Engström, Pär G, Kokocinski, Felix, Hubbard, Tim J, Guigó, Roderic, Harrow, Jennifer, Bertone, Paul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Nature Publishing Group US 01.12.2013
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1548-7091
1548-7105
1548-7105
DOI10.1038/nmeth.2714

Cover

More Information
Summary:The RGASP consortium compared 25 RNA-seq analysis programs in their ability to identify exons, reconstruct transcripts and quantify expression levels. Assembly of isoforms and their expression levels in higher eukaryotes remains a challenge. We evaluated 25 protocol variants of 14 independent computational methods for exon identification, transcript reconstruction and expression-level quantification from RNA-seq data. Our results show that most algorithms are able to identify discrete transcript components with high success rates but that assembly of complete isoform structures poses a major challenge even when all constituent elements are identified. Expression-level estimates also varied widely across methods, even when based on similar transcript models. Consequently, the complexity of higher eukaryotic genomes imposes severe limitations on transcript recall and splice product discrimination that are likely to remain limiting factors for the analysis of current-generation RNA-seq data.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC3851240
ISSN:1548-7091
1548-7105
1548-7105
DOI:10.1038/nmeth.2714