Dose-dependent satiating effect of whey relative to casein or soy

Dietary protein plays a role in body weight regulation, partly because of its effects on appetite. The objective was to compare the effects of high or normal casein-, soy-, or whey-protein breakfasts on appetite, specific hormones, amino acid responses and subsequent energy intake. Twenty-five healt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysiology & behavior Vol. 96; no. 4; pp. 675 - 682
Main Authors Veldhorst, Margriet A.B., Nieuwenhuizen, Arie G., Hochstenbach-Waelen, Ananda, van Vught, Anneke J.A.H., Westerterp, Klaas R., Engelen, Marielle P.K.J., Brummer, Robert-Jan M., Deutz, Nicolaas E.P., Westerterp-Plantenga, Margriet S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Inc 23.03.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0031-9384
1873-507X
1873-507X
DOI10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.01.004

Cover

More Information
Summary:Dietary protein plays a role in body weight regulation, partly because of its effects on appetite. The objective was to compare the effects of high or normal casein-, soy-, or whey-protein breakfasts on appetite, specific hormones, amino acid responses and subsequent energy intake. Twenty-five healthy subjects (mean ± SEM BMI:23.9 ± 0.3 kg/m 2; age:22 ± 1 years) received standardized breakfasts: custards with either casein-, soy, or whey-protein with either 10/55/35 (normal) or 25/55/20 (high)En% protein/carbohydrate/fat in a randomized, single-blind design. Appetite profile (Visual Analogue Scales) and amino acid concentrations were determined for 4 h whereas plasma glucose, insulin, active Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1), and active ghrelin concentrations were determined for 3 h; the sensitive moment for lunch was determined. Subjects returned for a second set of experiments and received the same breakfasts, ad lib lunch was offered 180 min later; energy intake (EI) was assessed. At 10En%, whey decreased hunger more than casein or soy ( p < 0.05), coinciding with higher leucine, lysine, tryptophan, isoleucine, and threonine responses ( p < 0.05). At 25En% there were no differences in appetite ratings. Whey triggered the strongest responses in concentrations of active GLP-1 ( p < 0.05) and insulin ( p < 0.05) compared with casein and/or soy. There were no differences in EI. In conclusion, differences in appetite ratings between different proteins appeared at a normal concentration; at 10En% whey-protein decreased hunger more than casein- or soy-protein. At 25En% whey-protein triggered stronger responses in hormone concentrations than casein- or soy-protein. The results suggest that a difference in appetite ratings between types of protein appears when certain amino acids are above and below particular threshold values.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0031-9384
1873-507X
1873-507X
DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.01.004