Narratives Great and Small: Neighbourhood Change, Place and Identity in Notting Hill
The area of Notting Hill in west London has been subject to much media coverage in recent years, which, along with substantial gentrification, has given rise to an image of the area as the epitome of fashionable London. This study investigates the views of those marginal to gentrification and mediat...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of urban and regional research Vol. 29; no. 1; pp. 67 - 88 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2005
Blackwell Wiley Blackwell |
Series | International Journal of Urban and Regional Research |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0309-1317 1468-2427 1468-2427 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00570.x |
Cover
Summary: | The area of Notting Hill in west London has been subject to much media coverage in recent years, which, along with substantial gentrification, has given rise to an image of the area as the epitome of fashionable London. This study investigates the views of those marginal to gentrification and mediated representation on their feelings about the local area, its image and their changing neighbourhoods. Many participants in the research resented some of the more recent changes in Notting Hill and the area's representation in the media. However, in contrast to expectations, most of the more working-class respondents involved in the research did not articulate much emotional attachment to the area. They were more concerned with what might be termed the material aspects of life in Notting Hill: convenience, facilities, safety and so on. In contrast, the more middle-class respondents frequently spoke of their regret of the changes to the area, such as the loss of independent shops, and the reduction in diversity. Paradoxically, the loss of working-class landscapes seems a relatively middle-class worry. The symbolically important landscapes described by working-class respondents were related to more immediate, material issues, in which gentrification was only a relatively minor concern. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:IJUR570 ark:/67375/WNG-M9QL4F5S-L istex:87FA3C30A4CEDA3177A849F7F388D69DEB64AE48 This article arises from a dissertation completed as part of an MSc in Society and Space at Bristol University, for which I was funded by an Economic and Social Research Council studentship. I would like to thank Gary Bridge, who supervised the research and helped to formulate this article. I am grateful to Tony Lemon and Hilda Parker for reading earlier drafts and providing useful comments, and to Ruth Hancock, then director of the Nuffield Community Care Studies Unit, University of Leicester, for granting me time to write this article when I worked there. I would also like to thank two anonymous referees for their intelligent criticism, and particularly for drawing my attention to a wider literature and helping me to strengthen my analysis and presentation. SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0309-1317 1468-2427 1468-2427 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00570.x |