Contingency learning in human fear conditioning involves the ventral striatum
The ability to detect and learn contingencies between fearful stimuli and their predictive cues is an important capacity to cope with the environment. Contingency awareness refers to the ability to verbalize the relationships between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. Although there is a heated...
Saved in:
Published in | Human brain mapping Vol. 30; no. 11; pp. 3636 - 3644 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.11.2009
Wiley-Liss |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1065-9471 1097-0193 1097-0193 |
DOI | 10.1002/hbm.20791 |
Cover
Summary: | The ability to detect and learn contingencies between fearful stimuli and their predictive cues is an important capacity to cope with the environment. Contingency awareness refers to the ability to verbalize the relationships between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. Although there is a heated debate about the influence of contingency awareness on conditioned fear responses, neural correlates behind the formation process of contingency awareness have gained only little attention in human fear conditioning. Recent animal studies indicate that the ventral striatum (VS) could be involved in this process, but in human studies the VS is mostly associated with positive emotions. To examine this question, we reanalyzed four recently published classical fear conditioning studies (n = 117) with respect to the VS at three distinct levels of contingency awareness: subjects, who did not learn the contingencies (unaware), subjects, who learned the contingencies during the experiment (learned aware) and subjects, who were informed about the contingencies in advance (instructed aware). The results showed significantly increased activations in the left and right VS in learned aware compared to unaware subjects. Interestingly, this activation pattern was only found in learned but not in instructed aware subjects. We assume that the VS is not involved when contingency awareness does not develop during conditioning or when contingency awareness is unambiguously induced already prior to conditioning. VS involvement seems to be important for the transition from a contingency unaware to a contingency aware state. Implications for fear conditioning models as well as for the contingency awareness debate are discussed. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | German Research Foundation Graduiertenkolleg 885 "NeuroAct" ArticleID:HBM20791 ark:/67375/WNG-BLLK7W3K-4 istex:F2C42B7840A06615A49CE0BA1C7C114E4C335DB4 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1065-9471 1097-0193 1097-0193 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hbm.20791 |