Factors predicting mathematics achievement in PISA : a systematic review
The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has become the world's largest comparative assessment of academic achievement. While hundreds of studies have examined the factors predicting student achievement in PISA, a comprehensive overview of the main predictors has yet to be comp...
Saved in:
Published in | Large-scale Assessments in Education Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 24 - 42 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
20.06.2023
Springer Springer Nature B.V SpringerOpen |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2196-0739 2196-0739 |
DOI | 10.1186/s40536-023-00174-8 |
Cover
Summary: | The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has become the world's largest comparative assessment of academic achievement. While hundreds of studies have examined the factors predicting student achievement in PISA, a
comprehensive overview of the main predictors has yet to be completed. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review of factors predicting mathematics performance in PISA. Guided by Bronfenbrenner's ecological model of
human development, we synthesized the findings of 156 peer reviewed articles. The analysis identified 135 factors that fall into five broad categories: individual student, household context, school community, education systems and macro
society. The analysis uncovered seven factors that are consistently associated with math achievement in PISA. Student grade level and overall family SES (socio-economic status) are consistently positively associated with math achievement
while five factors are consistently negatively associated with math achievement: student absenteeism and lack of punctuality, school repeating and dropout rate, school prevalence of students' misbehavior, shortage of teachers and general
staff, and student-centered instruction. Fourteen factors tend to be positively or negatively associated with math achievement. The explanatory power of many other factors, however, remain mixed. Explanations for this result include
methodological differences, complex interactions across variables, and underlying patterns related to national-cultural context or other meso or macro-level variables. Implications for policy and research are discussed. [Author
abstract] |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 42p. Refereed article. Includes bibliographical references. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 2196-0739 2196-0739 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s40536-023-00174-8 |