Factors predicting mathematics achievement in PISA : a systematic review

The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has become the world's largest comparative assessment of academic achievement. While hundreds of studies have examined the factors predicting student achievement in PISA, a comprehensive overview of the main predictors has yet to be comp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLarge-scale Assessments in Education Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 24 - 42
Main Authors Wang, Xiaofang Sarah, Perry, Laura B., Malpique, Anabela, Ide, Tobias
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 20.06.2023
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
SpringerOpen
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2196-0739
2196-0739
DOI10.1186/s40536-023-00174-8

Cover

More Information
Summary:The Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has become the world's largest comparative assessment of academic achievement. While hundreds of studies have examined the factors predicting student achievement in PISA, a comprehensive overview of the main predictors has yet to be completed. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review of factors predicting mathematics performance in PISA. Guided by Bronfenbrenner's ecological model of human development, we synthesized the findings of 156 peer reviewed articles. The analysis identified 135 factors that fall into five broad categories: individual student, household context, school community, education systems and macro society. The analysis uncovered seven factors that are consistently associated with math achievement in PISA. Student grade level and overall family SES (socio-economic status) are consistently positively associated with math achievement while five factors are consistently negatively associated with math achievement: student absenteeism and lack of punctuality, school repeating and dropout rate, school prevalence of students' misbehavior, shortage of teachers and general staff, and student-centered instruction. Fourteen factors tend to be positively or negatively associated with math achievement. The explanatory power of many other factors, however, remain mixed. Explanations for this result include methodological differences, complex interactions across variables, and underlying patterns related to national-cultural context or other meso or macro-level variables. Implications for policy and research are discussed. [Author abstract]
Bibliography:42p. Refereed article. Includes bibliographical references.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2196-0739
2196-0739
DOI:10.1186/s40536-023-00174-8