多系统萎缩^131I-间碘苄胍心肌显像初步研究

研究背景^131I-间碘苄胍(^131I-MIBG)可被心脏交感神经节后纤维摄取,是评价心脏交感神经功能的显像剂。本研究采用^131I-MIBG心肌显像方法,探讨多系统萎缩患者自主神经功能障碍。方法共12例符合2008年第2版诊断标准的多系统萎缩患者和7例正常对照者,通过统一多系统萎缩评价量表进行病情严重程度评价,静脉注射^131I-MIBG3mCi后于不同测量时间点(15min、4h和24h)采集胸部前位平面像,计算^131I-MIBG心肌摄取率。结果注射^131I-MIBG后15min和4h,多系统萎缩组患者^131I-MIBG心肌摄取率均低于正常对照组(15min:1.90±0.41对2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in中国现代神经疾病杂志 Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 257 - 262
Main Author 王丽 杨团峰 程敏 李原 王茜 焦劲松 顾卫红 王康 金淼 郭淮莲
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 100044,北京大学人民医院神经内科%100044,北京大学人民医院核医学科%卫生部中日友好医院神经内科, 北京,100029 2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1672-6731
DOI10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2014.03.018

Cover

More Information
Summary:研究背景^131I-间碘苄胍(^131I-MIBG)可被心脏交感神经节后纤维摄取,是评价心脏交感神经功能的显像剂。本研究采用^131I-MIBG心肌显像方法,探讨多系统萎缩患者自主神经功能障碍。方法共12例符合2008年第2版诊断标准的多系统萎缩患者和7例正常对照者,通过统一多系统萎缩评价量表进行病情严重程度评价,静脉注射^131I-MIBG3mCi后于不同测量时间点(15min、4h和24h)采集胸部前位平面像,计算^131I-MIBG心肌摄取率。结果注射^131I-MIBG后15min和4h,多系统萎缩组患者^131I-MIBG心肌摄取率均低于正常对照组(15min:1.90±0.41对2.38±0.32,P=0.017;4h:1.964-0.63对2.604-0.55,P=0.039)。结论多系统萎缩组患者^131I-MIBG心肌摄取率低于正常对照组,提示多系统萎缩可以发生心脏交感神经变性。
Bibliography:Background ^131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (^131I-MIBG) can be intaked by cardiac sympathetic postganglionic fibre, thus becomes the imaging agent to evaluate cardiac sympathetic nerve function. The aim of this study is to investigate the autonomic nerve dysfunction of patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) by using cardiac^131I-MIBG scintigraphy. Methods Clinical data of 12 MSA patients conforming to the "secord consensus statement on the diagnosis of MSA was analyzed by Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS). ^131I- MIBG scintigraphy was performed in 12 MSA patients and 7 age-matched controls. Planar images of the chest were obtained 15 rain, 4 h and 24 h after the intravenous injection of 3 mCi ^131I-MIBG. Cardiac 131I-MIBG uptake was quantified by comparing region of interest (ROI) over heart/mediastinum (H/M) ratio. Results Cardiac ^131I-MIBG uptake ratio in MSA group was significantly less than that in control group in 15 rain (1.90 ± 0.41 vs 2.38 ± 0.32, P = 0.017) and 4 h (1.96 ± 0.6
ISSN:1672-6731
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2014.03.018