Approaches to the rationalization of surgical instrument trays: scoping review and research agenda

Background Surgical Tray Rationalization (STR) consists of a systematic reduction in the number of surgical instruments to perform specific procedures without compromising patient safety while reducing losses in the sterilization and assembly of trays. STR is one example of initiatives to improve pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC health services research Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 163 - 15
Main Authors dos Santos, Bruno Miranda, Fogliatto, Flavio Sanson, Zani, Carolina Melecardi, Peres, Fernanda Araujo Pimentel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 20.02.2021
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1472-6963
1472-6963
DOI10.1186/s12913-021-06142-8

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Surgical Tray Rationalization (STR) consists of a systematic reduction in the number of surgical instruments to perform specific procedures without compromising patient safety while reducing losses in the sterilization and assembly of trays. STR is one example of initiatives to improve process performance that have been widely reported in industrial settings but only recently have gained popularity in healthcare organizations. Methods We conduct a scoping review of the literature to identify and map available evidence on surgical tray management. Five methodological stages are implemented and reported; they are: identifying research questions, identifying relevant studies, study selection, charting the data, and collating, summarizing and reporting the results. Results We reviewed forty-eight articles on STR, which were grouped according to their main proposed approaches: expert analysis, lean practices, and mathematical programming. We identify the most frequently used techniques within each approach and point to their potential contributions to operational and economic dimensions of STR. We also consolidate our findings, proposing a roadmap to STR with four generic steps (prepare, rationalize, implement, and consolidate) and recommended associated techniques. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study that reviews and systematizes the existing literature on the subject of STR. Our study closes with the proposition of future research directions, which are presented as nine research questions associated with the four generic steps proposed in the STR roadmap.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Literature Review-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1472-6963
1472-6963
DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06142-8