Who Is the Subject? Queer Theory Meets Oral History

The texts I discuss, in chronological order, include John D'Emilio's Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities (1983), Allan Bérubé's Coming Out under Fire (1990), Elizabeth Kennedy and Madeline Davis's Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold (1993), Esther Newton's Cherry Grove, Fire...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the history of sexuality Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 177 - 189
Main Author Boyd, Nan Alamilla
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Austin, TX University of Texas Press 01.05.2008
University of Texas at Austin (University of Texas Press)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1043-4070
1535-3605
1535-3605
DOI10.1353/sex.0.0009

Cover

More Information
Summary:The texts I discuss, in chronological order, include John D'Emilio's Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities (1983), Allan Bérubé's Coming Out under Fire (1990), Elizabeth Kennedy and Madeline Davis's Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold (1993), Esther Newton's Cherry Grove, Fire Island (1993), George Chauncey's Gay New York (1994), and John Howard's Men like That (1999).4 I'll also offer some methodological comments on my own publication, Wide-Open Town (2003).5 This essay explores how researchers-mostly historians but also a few anthropologists-have grappled with the challenge queer theory poses to oral history in its dependence both on self-knowing-that is, that narrators will be able to articulate a coherent or consistent representation of themselves as historical actors-and on transparent subjectivity-that is, that historians can somehow come to know these "selves" through their self-descriptions. Michel Foucault argues in The History of Sexuality that the discursive or cultural construction of the sexual self emerged at the same time as the rise of the modern nation-state and is linked to modern notions of citizenship.6 In other words, broad categories of national or cultural belonging (citizenship) have become dependent on meanings attached to sexual behavior (good/bad, moral/immoral, legal/criminal) and have produced the concept of sexual identity (heterosexual/homosexual).
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1043-4070
1535-3605
1535-3605
DOI:10.1353/sex.0.0009