Optimal Wavelet Transform for the Detection of Microaneurysms in Retina Photographs

In this paper, we propose an automatic method to detect microaneurysms in retina photographs. Microaneurysms are the most frequent and usually the first lesions to appear as a consequence of diabetic retinopathy. So, their detection is necessary for both screening the pathology and follow up (progre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on medical imaging Vol. 27; no. 9; pp. 1230 - 1241
Main Authors Quellec, G., Lamard, M., Josselin, P.M., Cazuguel, G., Cochener, B., Roux, C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.09.2008
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0278-0062
1558-254X
1558-254X
1558-0062
DOI10.1109/TMI.2008.920619

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this paper, we propose an automatic method to detect microaneurysms in retina photographs. Microaneurysms are the most frequent and usually the first lesions to appear as a consequence of diabetic retinopathy. So, their detection is necessary for both screening the pathology and follow up (progression measurement). Automating this task, which is currently performed manually, would bring more objectivity and reproducibility. We propose to detect them by locally matching a lesion template in sub- bands of wavelet transformed images. To improve the method performance, we have searched for the best adapted wavelet within the lifting scheme framework. The optimization process is based on a genetic algorithm followed by Powell's direction set descent. Results are evaluated on 120 retinal images analyzed by an expert and the optimal wavelet is compared to different conventional mother wavelets. These images are of three different modalities: there are color photographs, green filtered photographs, and angiographs. Depending on the imaging modality, microaneurysms were detected with a sensitivity of respectively 89.62%, 90.24%, and 93.74% and a positive predictive value of respectively 89.50%, 89.75%, and 91.67%, which is better than previously published methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0278-0062
1558-254X
1558-254X
1558-0062
DOI:10.1109/TMI.2008.920619