早期通便、引流治疗重症急性胰腺炎腹腔高压的效果观察
目的:探讨早期通便、引流对重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)治疗的效果。方法回顾性分析株洲市中心医院肝胆胰外科2009年1月-2015年1月收治的52例 SAP 患者的临床资料,分为常规治疗组(22例)和通便引流组(30例)。比较两组2周内多器官功能不全综合征及腹腔间隔室综合征发生率、腹内压降至15 cm H2 O 以下时间、胃肠功能恢复时间、胰腺感染率和病死率的差异。两组间计量资料比较采用独立样本 t 检验;计数资料比较采用χ2检验。结果与常规治疗组相比,早期通便引流组患者2周内多器官功能不全综合征及腹腔间隔室综合征发生率显著降低(31.8% vs 10.0%,22.7% vs 3.3%,χ2值分别为...
Saved in:
Published in | 临床肝胆病杂志 Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 106 - 109 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Chinese |
Published |
株洲市中心医院 肝胆胰外科,湖南 株洲,412000
2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1001-5256 |
DOI | 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.01.023 |
Cover
Summary: | 目的:探讨早期通便、引流对重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)治疗的效果。方法回顾性分析株洲市中心医院肝胆胰外科2009年1月-2015年1月收治的52例 SAP 患者的临床资料,分为常规治疗组(22例)和通便引流组(30例)。比较两组2周内多器官功能不全综合征及腹腔间隔室综合征发生率、腹内压降至15 cm H2 O 以下时间、胃肠功能恢复时间、胰腺感染率和病死率的差异。两组间计量资料比较采用独立样本 t 检验;计数资料比较采用χ2检验。结果与常规治疗组相比,早期通便引流组患者2周内多器官功能不全综合征及腹腔间隔室综合征发生率显著降低(31.8% vs 10.0%,22.7% vs 3.3%,χ2值分别为3.89、4.68,P 值分别为0.049、0.031),胰腺感染率及病死率显著下降(40.9% vs 13.3%,22.7% vs 3.3%,χ2值分别为5.15、4.68,P 值分别为0.023、0.031)。与常规治疗组相比,早期通便引流组患者腹内压降至15 cm H2 O 以下时间[(4.7±1.0)d vs (8.3±0.9)d]、肠鸣音[(3.0±0.5)d vs (6.5±0.9)d]及排气排便恢复时间[(3.8±0.7)d vs (7.8±0.9)d]明显缩短,差异均有统计学意义(t 值分别为1.02、6.67、2.13,P 值均<0.01)。结论 SAP 早期采取通便、引流可有效降低腹腔高压的程度,保护重要脏器功能,一定程度缓解 SAP 的病情,减少并发症的出现,从而显著改善 SAP 的预后。 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Objective To investigate the clinical effect of early bowel -relaxing treatment and drainage in the treatment of severe acute pan-creatitis (SAP).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 52 patients with SAP who were admitted to De-partment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery,Zhuzhou Central Hospital,from January 2009 to January 2015,and these patients were divided into conventional treatment group with 22 patients and early bowel -relaxing/drainage group with 30 patients.The incidence of multiple or-gan dysfunction syndrome and abdominal compartment syndrome within 2 weeks,time to intra -abdominal pressure reduced to below 15 cm H2 O,time to gastrointestinal function recovery,pancreatic infection rate,and mortality rate were compared between the two groups.The in-dependent samples t -test was used for comparison of continuous data between the two groups,and the chi -square test was used for compar-ison of categorical data.Results Compared with the conventional treatment group,the |
ISSN: | 1001-5256 |
DOI: | 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.01.023 |