Assessment of response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with F-18 FLT and F-18 FDG PET/CT in patients with rectal cancer

Objective The comparison of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro- d -glucose (F-18 FDG) and 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine (F-18 FLT) imaging in patients with rectal cancer before and after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) in relation to histopathology and immunohistochemistry obtained from surgery. Methods 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of nuclear medicine Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 284 - 294
Main Authors Rendl, Gundula, Rettenbacher, Lukas, Holzmannhofer, Johannes, Datz, Lidwina, Hauser-Kronberger, Cornelia, Fastner, Gerd, Öfner, Dietmar, Sedlmayer, Felix, Pirich, Christian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Tokyo Springer Japan 01.04.2015
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0914-7187
1864-6433
1864-6433
DOI10.1007/s12149-014-0938-2

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective The comparison of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro- d -glucose (F-18 FDG) and 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine (F-18 FLT) imaging in patients with rectal cancer before and after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) in relation to histopathology and immunohistochemistry obtained from surgery. Methods 20 consecutive patients (15 m, 5 f), mean age of 65 ± 10 years were included into this prospective study with a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 0.8 years. Results Among histopathological responders ( n  = 8 out of 20), posttreatment F-18 FLT and F-18 FDG scans were negative in 75 % ( n  = 6) and 38 % ( n  = 3), respectively. The mean response index (RI) was 61.0 % ± 14.0 % for F-18 FLT and 58.7 % ± 14.6 % for F-18 FDG imaging. Peritumoral lymphocytic infiltration (CD3 positive cells) was significantly related to posttreatment SUV max in F-18 FDG but not F-18 FLT studies. Conclusion A significant decrease of SUV max in F-18 FDG and F-18 FLT studies could be seen after RCT. Negative posttreatment F-18 FLT studies identified more histopathological responders.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0914-7187
1864-6433
1864-6433
DOI:10.1007/s12149-014-0938-2