Sensitivity of detection of radiofrequency surgical sponges: a prospective, cross-over study

A retained surgical sponge is a serious medical error that results in negative patient outcomes. Radiofrequency (RF) technology has recently been introduced to evaluate for the presence of a retained sponge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the detection of su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 201; no. 2; pp. 233 - 237
Main Author Steelman, Victoria M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.02.2011
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-9610
1879-1883
1879-1883
DOI10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.05.001

Cover

More Information
Summary:A retained surgical sponge is a serious medical error that results in negative patient outcomes. Radiofrequency (RF) technology has recently been introduced to evaluate for the presence of a retained sponge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the detection of surgical sponges embedded with an RF chip through the torsos of subjects of varying body habitus, including the morbidly obese. A prospective, crossover, and observer blinded study design was used. Subjects served as their own controls. With the subject supine, 4 surgical sponges were sequentially placed behind the subject's torso in locations approximating abdominal quadrants. Two hundred ten subjects were enrolled in the study. Nearly half (n = 101) were morbidly obese. Eight hundred forty readings were taken. There were no false-positive or false-negative readings. The sensitivity and specificity of detection of the RF sponges through the torsos of subjects of varying body habitus were 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of RF sponge technology are much higher than published reports of surgical counts or published findings of intraoperative radiographs for retained sponges.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.05.001