Corticospinal tract lesion load: An imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes

Objective The aim of this work was to investigate whether an imaging measure of corticospinal tract (CST) injury in the acute phase can predict motor outcome at 3 months in comparison to clinical assessment of initial motor impairment. Methods A two‐site prospective cohort study followed up a group...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of neurology Vol. 78; no. 6; pp. 860 - 870
Main Authors Feng, Wuwei, Wang, Jasmine, Chhatbar, Pratik Y., Doughty, Christopher, Landsittel, Douglas, Lioutas, Vasileios-Arsenios, Kautz, Steven A., Schlaug, Gottfried
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0364-5134
1531-8249
1531-8249
DOI10.1002/ana.24510

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective The aim of this work was to investigate whether an imaging measure of corticospinal tract (CST) injury in the acute phase can predict motor outcome at 3 months in comparison to clinical assessment of initial motor impairment. Methods A two‐site prospective cohort study followed up a group of first‐ever ischemic stroke patients using the Upper‐Extremity Fugl‐Meyer (UE‐FM) Scale to measure motor impairment in the acute phase and at 3 months. A weighted CST lesion load (wCST‐LL) was calculated by overlaying the patient's lesion map on magnetic resonance imaging with a probabilistic CST constructed from healthy control subjects. Regression models were fit to assess the predictive value of wCST‐LL and compared with initial motor impairment. Results Seventy‐six patients (37 from cohort 1 and 39 from cohort 2) completed the study. wCST‐LL as well as assessment of motor impairment (UE‐FM) in the acute phase correlated with motor impairment (UE‐FM) at 3 months in both cohort 1 (R2 = 0.69 vs. R2 = 0.67; p = 0.43) and cohort 2 (R2 = 0.69 vs. R2 = 0.62; p = 0.25). In the severely impaired subgroup (defined as UE‐FM ≤ 10 at baseline), wCST‐LL correlated with outcomes significantly better than clinical assessment (R2 = 0.47 vs. R2 = 0.11; p = 0.03). In the nonseverely impaired subgroup, stroke patients recovered approximately 70% of their maximal recovery potential. All stroke patients in both cohorts had poor motor outcomes at 3 months (defined as UE‐FM ≤ 25) when wCST‐LL was ≥ 7.0 cc (positive predictive value was 100%). Interpretation wCST‐LL, an imaging biomarker determined in the acute phase, can predict poststroke motor outcomes at 3 months, especially in patients with severe impairment at baseline. Ann Neurol 2015;78:860–870
Bibliography:Mary Crown and William Ellis Fund
American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant - No. 14SDG1829003
Richard and Rosalyn Slifka Family Fund
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
Tom and Suzanne McManmon Family Fund
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute/Medical University of South Carolina
National Institutes of Health (NIH) - No. UL1 RR029882; No. UL1 TR000062; No. NIH P20GM109040
Rehabilitation Research & Development Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs - No. NIH 1R01 DC008796; No. R01 DC009823-01
istex:9F824F4EE13D96C6BFF3B8A68BF8294BDF9E3600
ark:/67375/WNG-3SDZGLT3-0
ArticleID:ANA24510
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0364-5134
1531-8249
1531-8249
DOI:10.1002/ana.24510