抽雄期干旱胁迫与复水对不同玉米品种生长及产量的影响

【目的】探讨广西不同玉米品种在抽雄期对干旱胁迫及旱后复水的响应,为玉米抗旱机理研究、抗旱品种选育及广西玉米秋播用种选择提供理论依据。【方法】在大棚内采用桶栽法对桂单0810、迪卡008、正大619、琛玉969和桂单901等5个玉米品种在抽雄期进行4、8、12、16和20 d的干旱胁迫处理及相应胁迫时间后的复水处理试验,每个品种均以正常浇水为对照,分别于相应干旱胁迫时间后的第1 d及旱后复水15 d取样,统计次生根数、最长根长和绿叶数,测定各处理根、冠干物质量,计算各指标与对照的比值;成熟期计算单株果穗产量,以产量为基准计算抗旱系数和抗旱指数,并对抗旱系数进行聚类分析。【结果】干旱胁迫下各玉米品...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in南方农业学报 Vol. 48; no. 3; pp. 408 - 415
Main Author 何静丹 文仁来 田树云 苏月贵 何雪银 苏义成 程伟东 黄开健 张述宽
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 广西农业科学院 玉米研究所,南宁,530007%广西农业科学院,南宁,530007 2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2095-1191
DOI10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2017.03.005

Cover

More Information
Summary:【目的】探讨广西不同玉米品种在抽雄期对干旱胁迫及旱后复水的响应,为玉米抗旱机理研究、抗旱品种选育及广西玉米秋播用种选择提供理论依据。【方法】在大棚内采用桶栽法对桂单0810、迪卡008、正大619、琛玉969和桂单901等5个玉米品种在抽雄期进行4、8、12、16和20 d的干旱胁迫处理及相应胁迫时间后的复水处理试验,每个品种均以正常浇水为对照,分别于相应干旱胁迫时间后的第1 d及旱后复水15 d取样,统计次生根数、最长根长和绿叶数,测定各处理根、冠干物质量,计算各指标与对照的比值;成熟期计算单株果穗产量,以产量为基准计算抗旱系数和抗旱指数,并对抗旱系数进行聚类分析。【结果】干旱胁迫下各玉米品种的冠干重、根干重、次生根数、最长根长和绿叶数均比对照下降,且各指标与对照比值随胁迫时间的延长而下降。复水后,各指标的恢复生长量随胁迫时间的增加而减少;除最长根长在干旱胁迫4 d后复水出现超补偿生长外,其他指标均未产生超补偿效应。桂单0810、迪卡008和正大619在干旱胁迫下各指标的降幅均小于琛玉969和桂单901;复水后,前者的恢复能力又高于后者。桂单0810、迪卡008和正大619的抗旱系数和抗旱指数均高于琛玉969和桂单901,通过抗旱系数的聚类分析,可将5个玉米品种分为两大类,桂单0810、迪卡008和正大619归为抗旱性较强的品种,桂单901和琛玉969归为抗旱性较弱的品种。【结论】桂单0810、迪卡008和正大619在抽雄期受干旱胁迫时根、冠生长所受影响较小,且在复水后能够有效地恢复生长,从而保证较高的生物量及产量,可作为广西秋播玉米抗旱品种推广应用。
Bibliography:45-1381/S
maize ; tasseling stage ; drought stress; re-watering; drought tolerance
Objective】Response of major maize varieties in Guangxi to drought stress and re-watering at tasseling stage was studied to provide reference for drought-resistant mechanism, drought-resistant variety breeding and selection of maize variety for fall sowing. 【Method】Tub planting experiment in greenhouse was conducted. Five levels of drought stress(4,8,12,16 and 20 d) and re-watering after dought stress were carried on five maize varieties(Guidan 0810,Dika 008,Zhengda 619,Chenyu 969 and Guidan 901). Normal watering for each variety were taken as control. Samples were taken on day 1 of drought stress and day 15 of re-watering. Secondary root number, maximum root length and green leaf number were measured, root dry weight and shoot dry weight in each treatment were detected, and the ratio of each index to control was calculated. At maturation stage, maize ear yield per plant was detected, and drought coefficient and drought resistance
ISSN:2095-1191
DOI:10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2017.03.005