Factors Affecting Postoperative Course and Survival After En Bloc Resection for Esophageal Carcinoma

To identify factors affecting postoperative course and survival after esophagectomy for cancer and reasons for improved survival over time. Complete esophageal resection was attempted for middle and lower third esophageal carcinomas in 386 consecutive patients between January 1982 and January 2002....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Annals of thoracic surgery Vol. 78; no. 4; pp. 1177 - 1183
Main Authors Mariette, Christophe, Taillier, Guillaume, Van Seuningen, Isabelle, Triboulet, Jean-Pierre
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.10.2004
Elsevier Science
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-4975
1552-6259
1552-6259
DOI10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.068

Cover

More Information
Summary:To identify factors affecting postoperative course and survival after esophagectomy for cancer and reasons for improved survival over time. Complete esophageal resection was attempted for middle and lower third esophageal carcinomas in 386 consecutive patients between January 1982 and January 2002. Two study periods were analyzed: 1982 to 1993 and 1994 to 2002. Prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis and the two periods compared. Hospital mortality rate decreased from 5.4% to 2.9% ( p = 0.245). Both anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications rates decreased from 9.8% to 2.2% ( p = 0.001) and 24.1% to 19.3% ( p = 0.295), respectively. An increased proportion of patients had R0 resection in the latter period, 78.5% versus 67.0%, ( p = 0.028). Five-year survival rate after R0 resection increased from 29% to 46% ( p = 0.001), with a decreased recurrence rate from 65.8% to 44.3% ( p = 0.002). Three favorable prognostic factors were identified: low pT stage, pN0 stage, and operation during the 1994 to 2002 study period. Short-term outcome and survival of patients with resected esophageal cancer have improved over time. Advances in perioperative technique, staging methods, and surgical management combined with higher patient selection and use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation may be responsible for this progress.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-4975
1552-6259
1552-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.068