杨麦间作系统对太湖流域土壤氮流失的削减效应

过量施肥造成的农业面源污染已成为太湖水质下降及富营养化的主要原因之一。该试验在距离太湖湖岸带约1 km的小麦种植区对2种杨麦间作密度(其株距均为2 m,行距分别为5 m(AS1)和15 m(AS2))削减土壤氮流失效应进行研究。结果表明:杨树林冠层对降雨的截留主要集中于4-10月,AS1间作密度下林冠层对降雨的截留幅度达8.6%~44.5%。由于林冠层对降雨的再分配作用导致的径流量AS1R(去除枯落物:Remove litter)处理显著低于AS2R和MSL0(单作麦地中未铺设枯落物处理)处理(P〈0.05)。在整个小麦生长季,AS1S(有枯落物覆盖:Save litter)处理径流中TN、N...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in农业工程学报 Vol. 31; no. 16; pp. 167 - 177
Main Author 褚军 薛建辉 金梅娟 吴永波 侍昊 徐艺倩
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 南京林业大学生物与环境学院,江苏省林业生态工程重点实验室,南京 210037 2015
南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京 210037%苏州市农业科学院/江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所,苏州,215155%江苏省环境监测中心,南京,210036
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1002-6819
DOI10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.16.023

Cover

Abstract 过量施肥造成的农业面源污染已成为太湖水质下降及富营养化的主要原因之一。该试验在距离太湖湖岸带约1 km的小麦种植区对2种杨麦间作密度(其株距均为2 m,行距分别为5 m(AS1)和15 m(AS2))削减土壤氮流失效应进行研究。结果表明:杨树林冠层对降雨的截留主要集中于4-10月,AS1间作密度下林冠层对降雨的截留幅度达8.6%~44.5%。由于林冠层对降雨的再分配作用导致的径流量AS1R(去除枯落物:Remove litter)处理显著低于AS2R和MSL0(单作麦地中未铺设枯落物处理)处理(P〈0.05)。在整个小麦生长季,AS1S(有枯落物覆盖:Save litter)处理径流中TN、NO3--N平均浓度、流失量均显著低于MSL0(P〈0.05)。60 cm土层AS1S平均淋溶水量、TN、NO3--N平均浓度和流失量与AS2S、MSL0之间均存在显著差异(P〈0.05)。在杨树落叶期,AS1系统有枯落物覆盖下地表径流量、TN、NO3--N平均浓度和流失量均显著低于无枯落物处理(P〈0.05)。而AS2系统有无枯落物覆盖之间差异则不显著(P〉0.05)。在去除冠层及枯落物影响后,AS1R处理60 cm土层淋溶水量、TN和NO3--N淋溶流失量均显著低于20cm土层(P〈0.05),而MSL0系统下20、40、60 cm之间差异均不显著(P〉0.05)。由此可见,株行距为2 m×5 m的杨麦间作密度对地表径流、淋溶及氮流失的削减效应更显著。
AbstractList 过量施肥造成的农业面源污染已成为太湖水质下降及富营养化的主要原因之一。该试验在距离太湖湖岸带约1 km的小麦种植区对2种杨麦间作密度(其株距均为2 m,行距分别为5 m(AS1)和15 m(AS2))削减土壤氮流失效应进行研究。结果表明:杨树林冠层对降雨的截留主要集中于4-10月,AS1间作密度下林冠层对降雨的截留幅度达8.6%~44.5%。由于林冠层对降雨的再分配作用导致的径流量AS1R(去除枯落物:Remove litter)处理显著低于AS2R和MSL0(单作麦地中未铺设枯落物处理)处理(P〈0.05)。在整个小麦生长季,AS1S(有枯落物覆盖:Save litter)处理径流中TN、NO3--N平均浓度、流失量均显著低于MSL0(P〈0.05)。60 cm土层AS1S平均淋溶水量、TN、NO3--N平均浓度和流失量与AS2S、MSL0之间均存在显著差异(P〈0.05)。在杨树落叶期,AS1系统有枯落物覆盖下地表径流量、TN、NO3--N平均浓度和流失量均显著低于无枯落物处理(P〈0.05)。而AS2系统有无枯落物覆盖之间差异则不显著(P〉0.05)。在去除冠层及枯落物影响后,AS1R处理60 cm土层淋溶水量、TN和NO3--N淋溶流失量均显著低于20cm土层(P〈0.05),而MSL0系统下20、40、60 cm之间差异均不显著(P〉0.05)。由此可见,株行距为2 m×5 m的杨麦间作密度对地表径流、淋溶及氮流失的削减效应更显著。
S792.11%S512.1; 过量施肥造成的农业面源污染已成为太湖水质下降及富营养化的主要原因之一。该试验在距离太湖湖岸带约1 km的小麦种植区对2种杨麦间作密度(其株距均为2 m,行距分别为5 m (AS1)和15 m (AS2))削减土壤氮流失效应进行研究。结果表明:杨树林冠层对降雨的截留主要集中于4-10月,AS1间作密度下林冠层对降雨的截留幅度达8.6%~44.5%。由于林冠层对降雨的再分配作用导致的径流量AS1R(去除枯落物:Remove litter)处理显著低于AS2R和MSL0(单作麦地中未铺设枯落物处理)处理(P<0.05)。在整个小麦生长季,AS1S(有枯落物覆盖:Save litter)处理径流中TN、NO3--N平均浓度、流失量均显著低于MSL0(P<0.05)。60 cm土层AS1S平均淋溶水量、TN、NO3--N平均浓度和流失量与AS2S、MSL0之间均存在显著差异(P<0.05)。在杨树落叶期,AS1系统有枯落物覆盖下地表径流量、TN、NO3--N平均浓度和流失量均显著低于无枯落物处理(P<0.05)。而 AS2系统有无枯落物覆盖之间差异则不显著(P>0.05)。在去除冠层及枯落物影响后,AS1R处理60 cm土层淋溶水量、TN和NO3--N淋溶流失量均显著低于20cm土层(P<0.05),而MSL0系统下20、40、60 cm之间差异均不显著(P>0.05)。由此可见,株行距为2 m×5 m的杨麦间作密度对地表径流、淋溶及氮流失的削减效应更显著。
Abstract_FL Agricultural non-point pollution caused by the overuse of fertilizer in farmland has become one of the main factors for water quality deterioration and eutrophication in Taihu Lake. In order to select suitable agroforestry intercropping system to control soil nitrogen loss in Taihu Lake basin, a study was conducted at a distance of 1 km away from the lakeshore to find out how poplar-wheat intercropping system with 2 kinds of densities (AS1:poplar spacing 2 m×5 m;and AS2:poplar spacing 2 m×15 m) affected the amount of surface runoff, leaching and soil nitrogen loss. The interception of rainfall by the poplar canopy was mainly concentrated from April to October and ranged from 8.6%to 44.5%. The control effects of canopy layer on sprinkle and moderate rain (<1.0 mm/h) were obvious, which were reduced by 47.7% on average. Rainfall interception by canopy was mainly related to the LAI (leaf area index). The volume of rainfall difference between AS1 and MS (monoculture system) was only 0.8%during the defoliated period while the control effect of AS1 was raised to 6.4%during the growing period. Compared to AS2R (means removing litter) and MSL0 (monoculture of wheat without litter coverage), the runoff amount of AS1R decreased by 9.1% and 11.2%, respectively. There was a significant difference between AS1R and AS2R/MSL0 (P<0.05), while the difference between AS2R and MSL0 was not significant (P>0.05). Compared to MS, the volume of surface runoff, leaching and soil nitrogen loss were all effectively controlled by the 2 poplar-wheat intercropping systems. The control effects were more significant under the higher intercropping density. There was no significant difference between the average runoff volume of AS1S (means saving litter) and AS2S/MSL0 during the whole growing period (P>0.05), while their average concentration and leaching amount of total nitrogen (TN) and NO3--N were both significantly lower than MSL0 (P<0.05). The average leaching water amount of AS1S in the depth of 60 cm was significantly different from that of AS2S and MSL0 (P<0.05), while the difference between AS2S and MSL0 was not significant (P>0.05). The difference of average concentration and leaching amount of TN and NO3--N in 20 cm was not significant among AS1S, AS2S and MSL0 (P>0.05) while that in 60 cm was significant (P<0.05). The average runoff amounts of 2 intercropping systems without litter coverage were both higher than those with litter coverage during the poplar defoliated period. It was obvious that the runoff amount, average concentration and leaching amount of TN and NO3--N with litter coverage were lower than those without litter coverage in AS1 (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between AS2 with litter coverage and without (P>0.05). The litter volume was the major factor to decide whether there was significant difference between the surface runoff and leaching loss. The average surface runoff, concentration and leaching amount of TN and NO3--N with the litter coverage of 0.4 t/hm2 were significantly lower than those of 0.2, 0.1 and 0 t/hm2. The average leaching water volumes of AS1R in 20 and 40 cm soil depth were higher than those of MSL0 while the result in 60 cm was opposite. The decreasing range of leaching volume of AS1R in 60 cm depth was 1.3 times higher than that of MSL0, and the leaching volume of AS1R were different significantly in 20 and 60 cm (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference among 20, 40 and 60 cm for leaching volume of MSL0 (P>0.05). There was significant difference between average concentration of TN in 20 and 60 cm for AS1R, which were respectively 1.8 and 1.5 times lower than those for MSL0. The leaching loss of TN and NO3--N in 60 cm for AS1R was significantly lower than those in 20 cm. Thus it can be concluded that the effects of surface runoff, leaching and nitrogen loss reduction are more significant under the poplar-wheat intercropping system with the spacing of 2 m×5 m.
Author 褚军 薛建辉 金梅娟 吴永波 侍昊 徐艺倩
AuthorAffiliation 南京林业大学生物与环境学院,江苏省林业生态工程重点实验室,南京210037 南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京210037 苏州市农业科学院/江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所,苏州215155 江苏省环境监测中心,南京210036
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 南京林业大学生物与环境学院,江苏省林业生态工程重点实验室,南京 210037; 南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京 210037%苏州市农业科学院/江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所,苏州,215155%江苏省环境监测中心,南京,210036
Author_FL Xue Jianhui
Chu Jun
Xu Yiqian
Jin Meijuan
Shi Hao
Wu Yongbo
Author_FL_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Chu Jun
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Xue Jianhui
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Jin Meijuan
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Wu Yongbo
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Shi Hao
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Xu Yiqian
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: 褚军 薛建辉 金梅娟 吴永波 侍昊 徐艺倩
BookMark eNo9j0tLw0AUhWdRwar9E4K4SpybyUwmK5HiCwpuui-TSaam6FQbRLsUBB8bNz5AKllYRFz4QF20xX_jpPRfmFJxdTmHj3PumUEF3dQRQguAbQDfo0sNO04SbQPGjsU4-LaDgdrAbOyQAir--9OolCRxgCkQD2MXimg5u38a9R9Ht58_353hx2A4SM1rz3Sfs95N9nVs0tR0UvPQzd5exrL7Prw7MecX5vQyuz4z_as5NKXEThKV_u4sqq6tVssbVmVrfbO8UrEk9YkluOKYh2HgEK5UxIWKVBSQ_AlQbm4KLoIQk0go6XskBCekTDKfBa4EqYQis2hxEnsotBK6Xms0D1o6L6zpdl0eBeO9wPK1OTk_IeV2U9f345zda8W7otWuMUZ9F1OPkF9rHHMJ
ClassificationCodes S792.11%S512.1
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
DBID 2RA
92L
CQIGP
W95
~WA
2B.
4A8
92I
93N
PSX
TCJ
DOI 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.16.023
DatabaseName 维普_期刊
中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点
维普中文期刊数据库
中文科技期刊数据库-农业科学
中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点
Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong
WANFANG Data Centre
Wanfang Data Journals
万方数据期刊 - 香港版
China Online Journals (COJ)
China Online Journals (COJ)
DatabaseTitleList

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
DocumentTitleAlternate Effects of poplar-wheat intercropping system on soil nitrogen loss in Taihu Basin
DocumentTitle_FL Effects of poplar-wheat intercropping system on soil nitrogen loss in Taihu Basin
EndPage 177
ExternalDocumentID nygcxb201516023
665940573
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: 国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目; 国家林业局“948”项目; 江苏省高校自然科学研究重大项目; 江苏高校生物学优势学科建设工程项目
  funderid: (201104002); (2014-4-24); (12KJA180003); (2014-PAPD)
GroupedDBID -04
2B.
2B~
2RA
5XA
5XE
92G
92I
92L
ABDBF
ABJNI
ACGFO
ACGFS
AEGXH
AIAGR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
CCEZO
CHDYS
CQIGP
CW9
EOJEC
FIJ
IPNFZ
OBODZ
RIG
TCJ
TGD
TUS
U1G
U5N
W95
~WA
4A8
93N
ACUHS
PSX
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c593-a8f808ddb238ffe8afefeb33701f4b23a8abd03eafc973d12d56c696b4c1cfaf3
ISSN 1002-6819
IngestDate Thu May 29 04:04:19 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 14 10:28:53 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 16
Keywords litter
淋溶
nitrogen
runoff
poplar-wheat intercropping system
leaching

枯落物
土壤
根系
杨树-小麦间作系统
径流
林冠层
root
soils
forest canopy
Language Chinese
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c593-a8f808ddb238ffe8afefeb33701f4b23a8abd03eafc973d12d56c696b4c1cfaf3
Notes Agricultural non-point pollution caused by the overuse of fertilizer in farmland has become one of the main factors for water quality deterioration and eutrophication in Taihu Lake. In order to select suitable agroforestry intercropping system to control soil nitrogen loss in Taihu Lake basin, a study was conducted at a distance of 1 km away from the lakeshore to find out how poplar-wheat intercropping system with 2 kinds of densities (AS1: poplar spacing 2 mx5 m; and AS2: poplar spacing 2 mx 15 m) affected the amount of surface runoff, leaching and soil nitrogen loss. The interception of rainfall by the poplar canopy was mainly concentrated from April to October and ranged from 8.6% to 44.5%. The control effects of canopy layer on sprinkle and moderate rain (〈1.0 mm/h) were obvious, which were reduced by 47.7% on average. Rainfall interception by canopy was mainly related to the LAI (leaf area index). The volume of rainfall difference between AS1 and MS (monoculture system) was only 0.8% during the defoliate
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs wanfang_journals_nygcxb201516023
chongqing_primary_665940573
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2015
  text: 2015
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle 农业工程学报
PublicationTitleAlternate Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
PublicationTitle_FL Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher 南京林业大学生物与环境学院,江苏省林业生态工程重点实验室,南京 210037
南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京 210037%苏州市农业科学院/江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所,苏州,215155%江苏省环境监测中心,南京,210036
Publisher_xml – name: 南京林业大学生物与环境学院,江苏省林业生态工程重点实验室,南京 210037
– name: 南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京 210037%苏州市农业科学院/江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所,苏州,215155%江苏省环境监测中心,南京,210036
SSID ssib051370041
ssib017478172
ssj0041925
ssib001101065
ssib023167668
Score 2.0949006
Snippet 过量施肥造成的农业面源污染已成为太湖水质下降及富营养化的主要原因之一。该试验在距离太湖湖岸带约1 km的小麦种植区对2种杨麦间作密度(其株距均为2 m,行距分别为5...
S792.11%S512.1; 过量施肥造成的农业面源污染已成为太湖水质下降及富营养化的主要原因之一。该试验在距离太湖湖岸带约1 km的小麦种植区对2种杨麦间作密度(其株距均为2 m,...
SourceID wanfang
chongqing
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 167
SubjectTerms 土壤
径流
杨树-小麦间作系统
林冠层
枯落物
根系

淋溶
Title 杨麦间作系统对太湖流域土壤氮流失的削减效应
URI http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/90712X/201516/665940573.html
https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/nygcxb201516023
Volume 31
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate
  issn: 1002-6819
  databaseCode: ABDBF
  dateStart: 20140101
  customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn
  isFulltext: true
  dateEnd: 99991231
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0041925
  providerName: EBSCOhost
– providerCode: PRVALS
  databaseName: IngentaConnect Open Access Journals
  issn: 1002-6819
  databaseCode: FIJ
  dateStart: 20090101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  dateEnd: 20151231
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/title?j_type=online&j_startat=Aa&j_endat=Af&j_pagesize=200&j_page=1
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0041925
  providerName: Ingenta
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELb6kBAcEG9KAfWAT6sscRI79gk53awqJDgVqbdVntvTFkorQW9ISDwuXHhIqGgPVAhx4CHg0Fb8G7JV_wUzjrtdHqqASzSZHX-e8ST2OGt7CLnksTxw81A4yi0KJ_Dy0Em8MnWKpMwzJbLCNecUXLsu5m4EVxf4wtj4mZFVS6sraTNb--O-kv_xKvDAr7hL9h88OwQFBtDgX7iCh-H6Vz6msaCqRbWksaKRplogoUIaBTQOaNSiapbGcOvTKDJERFWbxpzqNo2UIQKqNeLArRKG4BBd4k8gWQsDiC3lozzKuFTHPwkDP2JYhdJUBsiRikptiJDKtlEVaIkcULXOObwXFhsxYbQFHIkgKBZSzRETDJSRqaVlbBSIrPnew0JjifXXhRAmaiBLIWVwIqwROFEMWjWwjUAnxRBIe1RyAw0F2g1jrmvaz1gJuiABdnsNoxsgtIwtoJI24sCCEoAujQ9QBWgdNfo5pd5Kavt-HByEtD24HRzsEGVfgtGuntVpRGzUwOpkNL8PSCrkZkTCKprDKnBNIW8y0XTr3da_nPktBFcYSfvjZNLDD00TZFJHrai9H-kynMwPu2KGaRDY_hZoDw84EPszSc58zGMwXP2E__1zsxDAKnSI0D11Lx-kLB5BsrjU696CwMrsc-uVSa87EpLNHyNH7VxqRtcvxnEytrZ4ghzR3WV7nkxxklwZvHq7u_Vm98WX79_Wdz5v72z3qw-b1ca7webzwdd7Vb9frfer1xuDj-_xduPTzsv71aPH1YMng2cPq62np8h8O56fnXNszhAn48p3EllKV-Z5CpFoWRYyKYuySH0wnpUBMBOZpLnrQ0-UqdDPmZdzkQkl0iBjWZmU_mky0VvqFWfJjCpYmAZFUHhlGeTST2WYYgK3IAwznxfeFJketkTnZn00TGfouCkyY9umYzuM253e3W52J8XGZAKa8tyBANPkMErWX_vOk4mV5dXiAsS_K-lF-yz8AMSoiIs
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E6%9D%A8%E9%BA%A6%E9%97%B4%E4%BD%9C%E7%B3%BB%E7%BB%9F%E5%AF%B9%E5%A4%AA%E6%B9%96%E6%B5%81%E5%9F%9F%E5%9C%9F%E5%A3%A4%E6%B0%AE%E6%B5%81%E5%A4%B1%E7%9A%84%E5%89%8A%E5%87%8F%E6%95%88%E5%BA%94&rft.jtitle=%E5%86%9C%E4%B8%9A%E5%B7%A5%E7%A8%8B%E5%AD%A6%E6%8A%A5&rft.au=%E8%A4%9A%E5%86%9B+%E8%96%9B%E5%BB%BA%E8%BE%89+%E9%87%91%E6%A2%85%E5%A8%9F+%E5%90%B4%E6%B0%B8%E6%B3%A2+%E4%BE%8D%E6%98%8A+%E5%BE%90%E8%89%BA%E5%80%A9&rft.date=2015&rft.issn=1002-6819&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=177&rft_id=info:doi/10.11975%2Fj.issn.1002-6819.2015.16.023&rft.externalDocID=665940573
thumbnail_s http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F90712X%2F90712X.jpg
http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wanfangdata.com.cn%2Fimages%2FPeriodicalImages%2Fnygcxb%2Fnygcxb.jpg