干热河谷冲沟不同部位土壤水分物理性质研究

本研究通过对元谋干热河谷典型冲沟集水区、沟头和沟床的考察采样及室内实验分析,研究了冲沟不同部位的土壤水分物理性质。结果表明:①冲沟不同部位土壤容重差异显著,其大小表现为:集水区〉沟床〉沟头,分别为1.71,1.58,1.45 g/cm^3,且集水区、沟头和沟床土壤容重均随土层深度的增加而增大;②各部位土壤总孔隙度和毛管孔隙度均表现为:沟头〉沟床〉集水区,且其均随土层深度的增加而呈现逐渐降低的趋势;③土壤田间持水量和毛管持水量在试验土层中均表现为:沟头〉沟床〉集水区,土壤饱和蓄水量则是:集水区〉沟床〉沟头;冲沟不同部位的土壤田间持水量、毛管持水量、饱和蓄水量和毛管蓄水量随土层深度的变化趋势相似,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in西南农业学报 Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 635 - 640
Main Author 郭敏 熊东红 张宝军 张素 杨丹 徐丽 陈廷明
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 中国科学院大学,北京100049%中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川成都610041 2016
中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川成都610041
中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川成都610041%凉山水土保持生态环境监测分站,四川西昌,615000%雷波县水土保持办公室,四川雷波,616550
中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川成都610041
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1001-4829
DOI10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2016.03.032

Cover

More Information
Summary:本研究通过对元谋干热河谷典型冲沟集水区、沟头和沟床的考察采样及室内实验分析,研究了冲沟不同部位的土壤水分物理性质。结果表明:①冲沟不同部位土壤容重差异显著,其大小表现为:集水区〉沟床〉沟头,分别为1.71,1.58,1.45 g/cm^3,且集水区、沟头和沟床土壤容重均随土层深度的增加而增大;②各部位土壤总孔隙度和毛管孔隙度均表现为:沟头〉沟床〉集水区,且其均随土层深度的增加而呈现逐渐降低的趋势;③土壤田间持水量和毛管持水量在试验土层中均表现为:沟头〉沟床〉集水区,土壤饱和蓄水量则是:集水区〉沟床〉沟头;冲沟不同部位的土壤田间持水量、毛管持水量、饱和蓄水量和毛管蓄水量随土层深度的变化趋势相似,均是随土层深度的增加而降低。
Bibliography:Soil water-physical properties; Gully; Different positions; Dry-hot valley
GUO Min , XIONG Dong-hong , ZHANG Bao-jun, ZHANG Su ,YANG Dan , XU Li, CHEN Ting-min ( 1. Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Processes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sichuan Chengdu 610041, China; 2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Sichuan Chengdu 610041, China; 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China ;4. Soil and Water Conservation Ecological Environment Monitoring Substation of Liangshan, Siehuan Xichang 615000, China; 5. Soll and Water Conservation Office in Leibo, Siehuan Leibo 616500, China)
51-1213/S
Based on the soil sample collections and laboratory tests of a whole gully, e.g. drainage area, gully head and gully bed, the soil water-physical properties of different positions were studied in this paper. The results showed that: (i)The soil hulk density of different gully positions showed significant difference, following the order: drainage area
ISSN:1001-4829
DOI:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2016.03.032